66626fd7   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: sofala@aapt.net.au   
      
   "Scout"  wrote:   
   > "bringyagrogalong"  wrote in message   
   > > "Scout"  wrote:   
   > >> "bringyagrogalong"  wrote in message   
   > >> > "Spartan613"  wrote:   
   > >> >> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   > >> >> >  wrote in message   
   > >> >> >> "Dechucka" wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >> >>> snip   
   >   
   > >> >> >>>>>> If done enough times.....   
   >   
   > >> >> >>>>> LOL so you're going after all tank crew members with your trusty   
   > >> >> >>>>> GI-O .22   
   >   
   > >> >> >>>> As the opportunity permits - absolutely.   
   >   
   > >> >> >>> I beleive that the cops may catch up with you before you murder   
   > >> >> >>> every tank crew mwmber in the US   
   >   
   > >> >> >> You may be right - you may be wrong.   
   >   
   > >> >> > actually I'm right   
   >   
   > >> >> Based on your experience, or what you read somewhere?   
   >   
   > >> > Vis-à-vis the Boston bombings...   
   >   
   > >> > To extrapolate the NRA's nonsense:   
   >   
   > >> > Bombs don't kill people, people kill people.   
   >   
   > >> Exactly. The person or person(s) who made, set and detonated those bombs   
   > >> are to blame.   
   >   
   > > Precisely!   
   >   
   > > So why should law abiding citizens be deprived from owning and   
   > > detonating bombs?   
   >   
   > Exactly. There are a number of legal and legitimate uses for bombs. From   
   > removing stumps to breaking up bed rock so you can dig a deep hole.   
      
   You just dug one for yourself.   
      
   I'm not talking about a few hayseeds, I'm talking about the same sort   
   of cart blanche freedom that gun owners have.   
      
   Are you seriously telling me that all citizens in the US are allowed   
   to have garages and homes full of bombs?   
      
   If not, why not?   
      
   See below:   
      
   > > Why should they be penalised because of the actions of criminals?   
   >   
   > Why should they?   
      
   So you have no objection if every home in the US was packed with bombs   
   and bomb making equipment?   
      
   You don't foresee any problems with that?   
      
   Interesting, but stupid!   
      
   Mind you, you also don't foresee a problem with homes being packed   
   with guns, even though more Americans have been shot to death by   
   fellow Americans then by all their enemies. Over a million since John   
   Lennon was gunned down.   
      
   Yep! Those guns sure are making things safer, Jethro.  LOL   
      
   > > Whoops!! That sounds exactly like the pro-gun argument, doesn't it?   
   >   
   > Yep, and you're not showing where there is any error in the reasoning.   
      
   I believe the opposite to be the case.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)