861cfad7
XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
news:04fa9083-f54c-4cc5-b149-618784e9fc92@pa2g2000pbb.googlegroups.com...
> "Scout" wrote:
>> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>> > "Spartan613" wrote:
>> >> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>> >> > wrote in message
>> >> >> "Dechucka" wrote:
>>
>> >> >>> snip
>>
>> >> >>>>>> If done enough times.....
>>
>> >> >>>>> LOL so you're going after all tank crew members with your trusty
>> >> >>>>> GI-O .22
>>
>> >> >>>> As the opportunity permits - absolutely.
>>
>> >> >>> I beleive that the cops may catch up with you before you murder
>> >> >>> every
>> >> >>> tank crew mwmber in the US
>>
>> >> >> You may be right - you may be wrong.
>>
>> >> > actually I'm right
>>
>> >> Based on your experience, or what you read somewhere?
>>
>> > Vis-à-vis the Boston bombings...
>>
>> > To extrapolate the NRA's nonsense:
>>
>> > Bombs don't kill people, people kill people.
>>
>> Exactly. The person or person(s) who made, set and detonated those bombs
>> are
>> to blame.
>
> Precisely!
>
> So why should law abiding citizens be deprived from owning and
> detonating bombs?
Exactly. There are a number of legal and legitimate uses for bombs. From
removing stumps to breaking up bed rock so you can dig a deep hole.
> Why should they be penalised because of the actions of criminals?
Why should they?
> Whoops!! That sounds exactly like the pro-gun argument, doesn't it?
Yep, and you're not showing where there is any error in the reasoning.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
