3511fe2e   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: wy_@myself.com   
      
   On 16 Apr, 22:37, "Scout"    
   wrote:   
      
   >   
   > >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of the   
   > >> argument, that is your choice.  However, the Supreme Court has ruled,   
   > >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.   
   >   
   > > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a right   
   > > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of 5-4.   
   >   
   > Oh, I'm sure he would have been happier with a 9-0 win, but in any event is   
   > was a win.   
   >   
   > > But a partisan ruling in and of itself is not a valid ruling.   
   >   
   > Sure, but can you show us it was a partisan ruling in and of itself?   
   >   
   > I don't think you can.   
      
   Hmm.  5 right wingnut judges vote one way and 4 left wingers vote the   
   other way.  How is that not partisan?   
      
      
   >   
   > >  If the   
   > > same make up of the court of 5 conservatives and 4 liberals had 2   
   > > liberals and 3 conservatives voting in favor for the same 5-4 result,   
   > > then that could be viewed as a more objective opinion because it'd be   
   > > based on a certain common ground agreed upon by both sides, it would   
   > > cross the spectrum of views and not be restricted to just one view.   
   >   
   > I see....so your complaint isn't that they got it wrong.   
   >   
   > Your complaint is that you don't view the court as being objective.   
   >   
   > Well, I can't help you with how you view the world. For that, you're on your   
   > own.   
      
   If the court isn't objective, then the likelihood of being wrong   
   follows.   
      
      
   >   
   > > There is no common ground in how the SC has ruled on gun issues,   
   > > especially with the right dominating the bench, if only by 1 vote, and   
   > > voting in unison on it.   
   >   
   > I agree, we need to get rid of those 4 on the Supreme Court that don't seem   
   > to understand what the 2nd Amendment means.   
      
   Proving my point of partisanship, especially when you side with the   
   other 5 on a partisan basis.   
      
      
   >   
   > So when can we expect to hear you call for their impeachment?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)