ba477545   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: wy_@myself.com   
      
   On 16 Apr, 22:38, "Scout"    
   wrote:   
   > "wy"  wrote in message   
   >   
   > news:758610b1-37ae-4de9-815c-fd416747d8bf@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   >   
   > > On 16 Apr, 18:03, RD Sandman    
   > > wrote:   
   >   
   > >> >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of the   
   > >> >> argument, that is your choice.  However, the Supreme Court has ruled,   
   > >> >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.   
   >   
   > >> > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a right   
   > >> > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of 5-4.   
   >   
   > >> I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.   
   >   
   > > Funny.  You don't think and write like one.   
   >   
   > How exactly do you feel a liberal should think and write?   
   >   
   > Please be specific in your answer and use examples with cites.   
      
   A liberal thinks and writes not like a right wingnut.  I thought you'd   
   at least be smart enough to figure that one out yourself.  As for   
   examples, just refer to everything you've written and rewrite it all   
   with an opposite point of view.  The resulting revelation of how dumb   
   you really were as a right wingnut will astound you.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)