66626fd7
XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net
"bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
news:bb741ae6-e24b-4794-b1b1-ecb1e85ab923@gh3g2000pbd.googlegroups.com...
> "Scout" wrote:
>> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>> > "Scout" wrote:
>> >> "bringyagrogalong" wrote in message
>> >> > "Spartan613" wrote:
>> >> >> "Dechucka" wrote in message
>> >> >> > wrote in message
>> >> >> >> "Dechucka" wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >>> snip
>>
>> >> >> >>>>>> If done enough times.....
>>
>> >> >> >>>>> LOL so you're going after all tank crew members with your
>> >> >> >>>>> trusty
>> >> >> >>>>> GI-O .22
>>
>> >> >> >>>> As the opportunity permits - absolutely.
>>
>> >> >> >>> I beleive that the cops may catch up with you before you murder
>> >> >> >>> every tank crew mwmber in the US
>>
>> >> >> >> You may be right - you may be wrong.
>>
>> >> >> > actually I'm right
>>
>> >> >> Based on your experience, or what you read somewhere?
>>
>> >> > Vis-à-vis the Boston bombings...
>>
>> >> > To extrapolate the NRA's nonsense:
>>
>> >> > Bombs don't kill people, people kill people.
>>
>> >> Exactly. The person or person(s) who made, set and detonated those
>> >> bombs
>> >> are to blame.
>>
>> > Precisely!
>>
>> > So why should law abiding citizens be deprived from owning and
>> > detonating bombs?
>>
>> Exactly. There are a number of legal and legitimate uses for bombs. From
>> removing stumps to breaking up bed rock so you can dig a deep hole.
>
> You just dug one for yourself.
Nope, but I bet you're getting ready to use a whole lot of straw.
> I'm not talking about a few hayseeds, I'm talking about the same sort
> of cart blanche freedom that gun owners have.
That's not what you said. If you wish to backpedal, it's a bit too late for
that.
> Are you seriously telling me that all citizens in the US are allowed
> to have garages and homes full of bombs?
Where did I say that?
(Straw man #1)
> If not, why not?
Because I didn't say that.
> See below:
>
>> > Why should they be penalised because of the actions of criminals?
>>
>> Why should they?
>
> So you have no objection if every home in the US was packed with bombs
> and bomb making equipment?
Where did I say that?
(Straw man #2)
However, to be honest, every home in America is packed with bomb making
equipment, if you know how to use it.
> You don't foresee any problems with that?
Not really, because the overwhelming majority of people are law abiding and
criminals don't care about the law anyway.
> Interesting, but stupid!
You're not that interesting, but you certainly are stupid.
> Mind you, you also don't foresee a problem with homes being packed
> with guns, even though more Americans have been shot to death by
> fellow Americans then by all their enemies. Over a million since John
> Lennon was gunned down.
Where did I say that?
(Straw man #3)
> Yep! Those guns sure are making things safer, Jethro. LOL
Overall they are. Around 1.5-2.5 million defensive gun uses each year
according to studies.
>> > Whoops!! That sounds exactly like the pro-gun argument, doesn't it?
>>
>> Yep, and you're not showing where there is any error in the reasoning.
>
> I believe the opposite to be the case.
Oh, well as long as YOU believe it....then who needs proof, right?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
