ba477545   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "wy"  wrote in message   
   news:87d49275-8e6e-470e-9770-b4bc18dc055b@c7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   > On 16 Apr, 22:38, "Scout"    
   > wrote:   
   >> "wy"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:758610b1-37ae-4de9-815c-fd416747d8bf@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> > On 16 Apr, 18:03, RD Sandman    
   >> > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of the   
   >> >> >> argument, that is your choice.  However, the Supreme Court has   
   >> >> >> ruled,   
   >> >> >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.   
   >>   
   >> >> > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a right   
   >> >> > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of 5-4.   
   >>   
   >> >> I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.   
   >>   
   >> > Funny.  You don't think and write like one.   
   >>   
   >> How exactly do you feel a liberal should think and write?   
   >>   
   >> Please be specific in your answer and use examples with cites.   
   >   
   > A liberal thinks and writes not like a right wingnut.   
      
   IOW, you have no idea of how he should think or write.   
   >  I thought you'd   
   > at least be smart enough to figure that one out yourself.   
      
   Nope, you're simply stating how he shouldn't think or write, I asked you how   
   a liberal thinks and writes. Seems you don't know.   
      
   Though I suspect it doesn't have lot to do with actually being able to   
   think, knowing what is being talked about, using facts, and primarily by not   
   pointing out how you're wrong in what you say.   
      
      
   >  As for   
   > examples, just refer to everything you've written and rewrite it all   
   > with an opposite point of view.   
      
   But we're not talking about me, and what's wrong with having an opposite   
   point of view particularly if the facts support that point of view?   
      
   Are you telling me that liberalism is all about agreeing with each other   
   even someone is ignorant, stupid, wrong or flat out lying?   
      
      
   > The resulting revelation of how dumb   
   > you really were as a right wingnut will astound you.   
      
   And so we reach the end and you've yet to answer the simple question put to   
   you.   
      
   And you want to talk about being dumb. You want to see dumb?   
      
   Look in your mirror.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)