b4d4ca02   
   XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   XPost: can.politics   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "wy"  wrote in message   
   news:c1a62b1c-7761-4c03-8bca-e9c687aee9b2@a34g2000vbt.googlegroups.com...   
   > On 17 Apr, 20:29, "Scout"    
   > wrote:   
   >> "wy"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> news:87d49275-8e6e-470e-9770-b4bc18dc055b@c7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> > On 16 Apr, 22:38, "Scout"    
   >> > wrote:   
   >> >> "wy"  wrote in message   
   >>   
   >> >>news:758610b1-37ae-4de9-815c-fd416747d8bf@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...   
   >>   
   >> >> > On 16 Apr, 18:03, RD Sandman    
   >> >> > wrote:   
   >>   
   >> >> >> >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of   
   >> >> >> >> the   
   >> >> >> >> argument, that is your choice.  However, the Supreme Court has   
   >> >> >> >> ruled,   
   >> >> >> >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a   
   >> >> >> > right   
   >> >> >> > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of   
   >> >> >> > 5-4.   
   >>   
   >> >> >> I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.   
   >>   
   >> >> > Funny.  You don't think and write like one.   
   >>   
   >> >> How exactly do you feel a liberal should think and write?   
   >>   
   >> >> Please be specific in your answer and use examples with cites.   
   >>   
   >> > A liberal thinks and writes not like a right wingnut.   
   >>   
   >> IOW, you have no idea of how he should think or write.   
   >   
   > I already said what he'd have to do.  The opposite of what he already   
   > is doing.  Boy, you're stupid.   
      
   So basically, he should ignore the facts, cease thinking, and blindly accept   
   that the bullshit you spout is the truth?   
      
   Is that what you think being a liberal is all about?   
      
      
   >> >  I thought you'd   
   >> > at least be smart enough to figure that one out yourself.   
   >>   
   >> Nope, you're simply stating how he shouldn't think or write, I asked you   
   >> how   
   >> a liberal thinks and writes. Seems you don't know.   
   >>   
   >> Though I suspect it doesn't have lot to do with actually being able to   
   >> think, knowing what is being talked about, using facts, and primarily by   
   >> not   
   >> pointing out how you're wrong in what you say.   
   >>   
   >> >  As for   
   >> > examples, just refer to everything you've written and rewrite it all   
   >> > with an opposite point of view.   
   >>   
   >> But we're not talking about me, and what's wrong with having an opposite   
   >> point of view particularly if the facts support that point of view?   
   >   
   > Nothing's wrong, so long as the opposite view makes sense.  Repugnants   
   > don't make sense.  Ever.   
      
   No wonder you don't make sense.   
      
      
   >> Are you telling me that liberalism is all about agreeing with each other   
   >> even someone is ignorant, stupid, wrong or flat out lying?   
   >   
   > No, don't be boy, you're stupid.   
      
   And yet, you're not smart enough to refute my points with facts rather than   
   empty assertions, assumptions, opinions and fantasy.   
      
   >> > The resulting revelation of how dumb   
   >> > you really were as a right wingnut will astound you.   
   >>   
   >> And so we reach the end and you've yet to answer the simple question put   
   >> to   
   >> you.   
   >>   
   >> And you want to talk about being dumb. You want to see dumb?   
   >>   
   >> Look in your mirror.   
   >   
   > Pretty handsome guy if I have to say so myself.   
      
   And very dumb   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)