d5001cb6
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,
talk.politics.guns
XPost: can.politics
From: wy_@myself.com
On 17 Apr, 22:11, "Scout"
wrote:
> "wy" wrote in message
>
> news:c1a62b1c-7761-4c03-8bca-e9c687aee9b2@a34g2000vbt.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 17 Apr, 20:29, "Scout"
> > wrote:
> >> "wy" wrote in message
>
> >>news:87d49275-8e6e-470e-9770-b4bc18dc055b@c7g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > On 16 Apr, 22:38, "Scout"
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> "wy" wrote in message
>
> >> >>news:758610b1-37ae-4de9-815c-fd416747d8bf@y2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> >> > On 16 Apr, 18:03, RD Sandman
> >> >> > wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other side of
> >> >> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >> argument, that is your choice. However, the Supreme Court has
> >> >> >> >> ruled,
> >> >> >> >> and, IMHO, gotten it right.
>
> >> >> >> > Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're a
> >> >> >> > right
> >> >> >> > wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan win of
> >> >> >> > 5-4.
>
> >> >> >> I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.
>
> >> >> > Funny. You don't think and write like one.
>
> >> >> How exactly do you feel a liberal should think and write?
>
> >> >> Please be specific in your answer and use examples with cites.
>
> >> > A liberal thinks and writes not like a right wingnut.
>
> >> IOW, you have no idea of how he should think or write.
>
> > I already said what he'd have to do. The opposite of what he already
> > is doing. Boy, you're stupid.
>
> So basically, he should ignore the facts, cease thinking, and blindly accept
> that the bullshit you spout is the truth?
Better than the garbage that's yesterday's crusty vomit that
Repugnants love to lap up.
>
> Is that what you think being a liberal is all about?
No. But it still is better.
> >> > I thought you'd
> >> > at least be smart enough to figure that one out yourself.
>
> >> Nope, you're simply stating how he shouldn't think or write, I asked you
> >> how
> >> a liberal thinks and writes. Seems you don't know.
>
> >> Though I suspect it doesn't have lot to do with actually being able to
> >> think, knowing what is being talked about, using facts, and primarily by
> >> not
> >> pointing out how you're wrong in what you say.
>
> >> > As for
> >> > examples, just refer to everything you've written and rewrite it all
> >> > with an opposite point of view.
>
> >> But we're not talking about me, and what's wrong with having an opposite
> >> point of view particularly if the facts support that point of view?
>
> > Nothing's wrong, so long as the opposite view makes sense. Repugnants
> > don't make sense. Ever.
>
> No wonder you don't make sense.
That's just you saying that in your backwards, upside down, cock-eyed
koo koo universe. The flip side of that means I am making sense.
>
> >> Are you telling me that liberalism is all about agreeing with each other
> >> even someone is ignorant, stupid, wrong or flat out lying?
>
> > No, don't be boy, you're stupid.
>
> And yet, you're not smart enough to refute my points with facts rather than
> empty assertions, assumptions, opinions and fantasy.
I wasn't refuting anything you were saying anyway, I was stating
points to which you're exhibiting an intellectual coma on your part in
being able to refute any of my statements.
>
> >> > The resulting revelation of how dumb
> >> > you really were as a right wingnut will astound you.
>
> >> And so we reach the end and you've yet to answer the simple question put
> >> to
> >> you.
>
> >> And you want to talk about being dumb. You want to see dumb?
>
> >> Look in your mirror.
>
> > Pretty handsome guy if I have to say so myself.
>
> And very dumb
In your backwards, upside down and cock-eyed koo koo universe that
means I'm quite smart in the real world.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
