a03babb9
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,
can.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: wy_@myself.com
On 18 Apr, 15:23, RD Sandman
wrote:
> wy wrote innews:4a920e0d-a867-45bb-a419-595b
fb2431e@a6g2000vbm.googlegroups.com:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On 18 Apr, 13:51, RD Sandman
> > wrote:
> >> wy wrote
> >> innews:124eae0f-f3ea-45e8-bdf7-4d6f2eea921c@o9
> > g2000vbk.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> > On 18 Apr, 12:39, RD Sandman
> >> > wrote:
> >> >> wy wrote in
> >> >> news:93456c80-5211-47d5-9c9a-12bda53e1bb7
> >> >> @cm2g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >> > On 17 Apr, 13:02, "Wayne" wrote:
> >> >> >> "Sid9" wrote in messagenews:kkmhoe$mul$1@dont-email.me...
> >> >> >> "Wayne" wrote in message
>
> >> >> >>news:kkmhkb$lop$1@dont-email.me...
>
> >> >> >> > "Sid9" wrote in messagenews:kkku1n$1nd$1@dont-email.me...
>
> >> >> >> > "RD Sandman" wrote in
> >> >> >> > message
> >> >> >> >news:XnsA1A49923B5EAChopewell@216.196.121.131...
> >> >> >> >> wy wrote in
> >> >> >> >>news:abbcb413-a928-437b-9ba3-dad98c2b7a63
>
> >> >> @o9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com:
>
> >> >> >> >>> On 16 Apr, 16:15, RD Sandman
> >> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >> >>>> wy wrote
> >> >> >> >>>> >> And anyone who doesn't grow up can be Vice President.
>
> >> >> >> >>>> >> Sleep well, tonight.....
>
> >> >> >> >>>> >> RD (The Sandman)
>
> >> >> >> >>>> If you don't wish to discuss it and consider the other
> >> >> >> >>>> side of
> >> >> the
> >> >> >> >>>> argument, that is your choice. However, the Supreme Court
> >> >> >> >>>> has
> >> >> rul
> >> >> > ed,
> >> >> >> >>>> and, IMHO, gotten it right.
>
> >> >> >> >>> Well, of course it's gotten it right for you because you're
> >> >> >> >>> a
> >> >> right
> >> >> >> >>> wingnut who's totally satisfied by a razor-thin partisan
> >> >> >> >>> win of 5-
> >> >> 4.
>
> >> >> >> >> I am an independent and not long ago a registered Democrat.
>
> >> >> >> > # ??????????
> >> >> >> > # ...since we got black president????????
> >> >> >> > # ??????????
>
> >> >> >> > # Surely not because he's liberal....because he is not a
> >> >> >> > liberal.
>
> >> >> >> > Sid, here's a stunner for you. I was a democrat for many
> >> >> >> > years. I've always wanted to be a democrat, but they keep
> >> >> >> > doing batshit
> >> >> crazy
> >> >> >> > stuff that is worse
> >> >> >> > than the alternative. Now it's probably 30 years since I
> >> >> >> > voted fo
> >> > r
> >> >> a
> >> >> >> > democrat at the state or federal level.
>
> >> >> >> # What state do you live in?
>
> >> >> >> The mother of all batshit crazy liberal states: California
>
> >> >> > Clearly, you were never a Democrat. Democrats don't call any
> >> >> > liberal state batshit crazy. Only Repugnants do. There isn't a
> >> >> > Democrat b
> >> > one
> >> >> > in your body or brain.
>
> >> >> People can change...are you the same as you were when you were a
> >> >> child?
>
> >> > Right wingnutism is an aberration of humanity. �A right wingnut can
> >> > find the light and go liberal, but a liberal, who has seen the
> >> > light, can never go into the dark and become a right wingnut. �If
> >> > they do, it's because they never really saw the light they thought
> >> > they did in the first place, having always lived in the dark to
> >> > really be able to see it.
>
> >> You wouldn't happen to be biased in the least would you.
>
> > You're not proving that I am. But you are proving that you sit in the
> > dark.
>
> I am not proving either but your last statement proved I am right. Thank
> you.
So you do sit in the dark. Those who do are the ones who won't, or
just plain can't, prove or disprove anything.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
