XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.usa.constitution.gun-rights,   
   talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "David Hartung"  wrote in message   
   news:HeudnSiHKqoTRPTMnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@giganews.com...   
   > On 04/13/2013 04:36 PM, wy wrote:   
   >> On 13 Apr, 17:05, RD Sandman    
   >> wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>> In other words, you don't need a hi cap magazine for anything.   
   >>>   
   >>> So?  What does need have to do with it?  Do you need a V-8 or a V-6 in   
   >>> your car.  Do you even need a 4?   
   >>   
   >> When it comes to killing, need has everything to do with it?  How many   
   >> times and how quickly do you *need* to kill?   
   >   
   > Look at the wording of the Second Amendment, and then go back a learn what   
   > the founders had to say about it. The purpose of an armed citizenry is to   
   > protect the country from invaders, and if necessary, from the government   
   > itself. That being the purpose, does it not make sense that we arm   
   > ourselves with the expectation of facing soldiers who will be armed with   
   > automatic weapons and other nasty little surprises? IN such a scenario,   
   > limiting the size of clips, could mean more dead citizens.   
   >   
   >   
      
   But the government does NOT want to risk facing armed citizens when they try   
   to do what the British tried to do with the Patriots.   
   They are VERY MUCH AFRAID of having the same success..   
   They want subjects NOT citizens   
   That is why the statists are desperate to DISARM the citizens.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)