XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: bjfoster9959@yahoo.com.au
On 20/04/2013 10:33 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
> On 4/20/2013 10:16 AM, ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence wrote:
>> On 20/04/2013 10:10 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>> On 4/20/2013 9:48 AM, ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence wrote:
>>>> On 20/04/2013 9:39 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On 4/20/2013 9:34 AM, ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence wrote:
>>>>>> On 20/04/2013 8:47 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On 4/20/2013 8:31 AM, Klaus Schadenfreude wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 08:27:56 +1000, Trevor Wilson
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> **You may care to note that it was the extensive use of
>>>>>>>>> surveillance
>>>>>>>>> cameras that have allowed the police and FBI to hone in on the
>>>>>>>>> Boston
>>>>>>>>> bommbing perpetrators so rapidly. Any future attempts by the perps
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> been effectively neutralised.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not aware of any "extensive use" of cameras.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> **Then I suggest you read or watch some news reports.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Don't you snip my posts, you pathetic little twot.
>>>
>>> **Fuck off, you stupid cunt. Read the enws reports and/or watch the
>>> news.
>>>
>>
>> ROTFL. Twevor loses it.
>>
>>
>>
>> There were *particular* cameras which helped to indentify the suspects.
>
> **There you go. That wasn't hard, was it?
>
> Now read what I wrote.
>
Which part, "Fuck off, you stupid cunt" or "Read the enws reports" or
wuzzit the "extensive use" of targeted cameras?
The last IN RESPONSE TO:
"We will have a million CCTV cameras per square mile/kilometre before
they admit that monitoring the general population is a waste of time. In
the process they will dream up all sorts of reasons to maintain their
surveillance of the general population".
Fucken moron.
ROTFL. Twevor loses it.
There were *particular* cameras which helped to indentify the suspects.
I doubt that anyone has an issue with surveillance cameras used by
protective forces under strict protocols.
It is perfectly logical to mount cameras (or enable them) at such an
event and then disable them afterward. There is absolutely NO NEED for
the widespread proliferation of security cameras.
The news reports show images from a *particular* set of cameras *at* the
event, which is entirely *appropriate* given the threat level and the
need to protect the public at such events.
Now run along an go ping your VPN router. See if that can tell you anything.
>
--
Julia Gillard...
"I don't want the mining industry to hire a single foreign worker if
there is an Australian who can do the job"
(PS: Who issues the visas????????????????????)
"Wayne Swan was explicitly asked to rule out a further increase in the
debt limit above the current limit of $300 billion. He steadfastly refused".
http://liberal.org.au/latest-news/2013/03/13/swan-refuses-rule-o
t-increase-debt-limit-above-300-billion
Swan...
"The course of action I'm talking about today really comes very much, I
guess, to the core of my values and the values of the Labor Party"
Paul Howes...
"Labor has an obligation to stop extremists who threaten our democracy"
How much new law is there every year?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lePrBUHihKI
Tony Abbott...
"You do not save the environment by killing the economy"
"It's not about popularity, it's about gaining respect, and she hasn't
got it yet"
(Australian of the Year, 2013)
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
