XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Trevor Wilson"  wrote in message   
   news:ate4m7Ffj68U1@mid.individual.net...   
   > On 4/20/2013 9:44 AM, Scout wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Trevor Wilson"  wrote in message   
   >> news:ate2shFf89pU1@mid.individual.net...   
   >>> On 4/20/2013 9:27 AM, Scout wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Trevor Wilson"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:ate000Fek8tU2@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>>> On 4/20/2013 8:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:XnsA1A782B5E82D8hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >>>>>>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:atc1j0F11bvU1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/19/2013 7:56 AM, Dechucka wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> .... something as simple as universal background checks couldn't   
   >>>>>>>>> be   
   >>>>>>>>> passed. Maybe the US is just a sick and violent society   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> **Not so much. The US is saddled with a bunch of gutless   
   >>>>>>>> politicians,   
   >>>>>>>> who value the opinions of the NRA more than their constituents. The   
   >>>>>>>> majority of Americans are probably disgusted with their elected   
   >>>>>>>> senators. They need to be reminded of just how weak these creatures   
   >>>>>>> are.   
   >>>>>>>> They're not interested in the well-being of the American people.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> They are interested in re-election.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> sad, so election is more important than dead Americans   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> **It would seem so. Except to a tiny handful of Republican senators   
   >>>>> and the majority of Democrat senators. Americans should keep those   
   >>>>> names in mind. Both the brave ones and the gutless ones.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yep, the ones that voted for it need to go,   
   >>>   
   >>> **Why do you support a criminal's right to obtain firearms?   
   >>   
   >> Who said I do?   
   >   
   > **You object to good, sane controls on guns.   
      
   I do? Where did I do so?   
      
   >Therefore, you support a criminal's right to easily obtain firearms.   
      
   Sorry, one doesn't follow from the other, particularly when I haven't   
   objected to good, sane controls on guns.   
      
      
   >>>  and the ones the opposed it   
   >>>> need to stay unless we have someone better.   
   >>>   
   >>> **You already have someone better.   
   >>   
   >> Who would that be?   
   >   
   > **A tiny handful of Republicans and most of the Democrats.   
      
   IOW, you have no idea.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)