XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com
"Dechucka" wrote in message
news:X6ydncIwFOnsTuzMnZ2dnUVZ_v2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>
> "ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence" wrote in
> message news:ate1kiFev1oU1@mid.individual.net...
>> On 20/04/2013 8:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>
>>> "ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence" wrote in
>>> message news:atdqsqFdk9mU1@mid.individual.net...
>>>> On 20/04/2013 7:06 AM, keithr wrote:
>>>>> On 20/04/2013 5:50 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote in
>>>>>> news:atc1j0F11bvU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 4/19/2013 7:56 AM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>>> .... something as simple as universal background checks couldn't be
>>>>>>>> passed. Maybe the US is just a sick and violent society
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> **Not so much. The US is saddled with a bunch of gutless
>>>>>>> politicians,
>>>>>>> who value the opinions of the NRA more than their constituents. The
>>>>>>> majority of Americans are probably disgusted with their elected
>>>>>>> senators. They need to be reminded of just how weak these creatures
>>>>>> are.
>>>>>>> They're not interested in the well-being of the American people.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They are interested in re-election.
>>>>>>
>>>>> and are willing to put their own interests before those of the people
>>>>> who elected them.
>>>>
>>>> So according to your theory, elected officials should disregard the
>>>> wishes of those who elected them and do what they (or you?) regard to
>>>> be in peoples' interest?
>>>
>>> read what he said slowly
>>
>> Duh dat wot happen in a duh-mocracy, duh-chuckah
>
> That there is 90% support for background checks and that simple law is not
> passed. You have a strange idea of democracy
Not in the real world, chucklehead
Only in the fantasies of ignorant parrots like you
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
