XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com
"Dechucka" wrote in message
news:tMydnZdamsdvTuzMnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@westnet.com.au...
>
> "Scout" wrote in message
> news:kksjok$142$2@dont-email.me...
>>
>>
>> "Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
>> news:ate000Fek8tU2@mid.individual.net...
>>> On 4/20/2013 8:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>>>> news:XnsA1A782B5E82D8hopewell@216.196.121.131...
>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote in
>>>>> news:atc1j0F11bvU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/19/2013 7:56 AM, Dechucka wrote:
>>>>>>> .... something as simple as universal background checks couldn't be
>>>>>>> passed. Maybe the US is just a sick and violent society
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **Not so much. The US is saddled with a bunch of gutless politicians,
>>>>>> who value the opinions of the NRA more than their constituents. The
>>>>>> majority of Americans are probably disgusted with their elected
>>>>>> senators. They need to be reminded of just how weak these creatures
>>>>> are.
>>>>>> They're not interested in the well-being of the American people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> They are interested in re-election.
>>>>
>>>> sad, so election is more important than dead Americans
>>>
>>> **It would seem so. Except to a tiny handful of Republican senators and
>>> the majority of Democrat senators. Americans should keep those names in
>>> mind. Both the brave ones and the gutless ones.
>>
>> Yep, the ones that voted for it need to go, and the ones the opposed it
>> need to stay unless we have someone better.
>
> Why? Do you have a problem with background checks so some guns are kept
> out of the hands of people the law says shouldn't have them?
Too bad there is NOTHING to show that they would do anything like that.
Oh well
Idiots like you don't need EVIDENCE to support your beliefs.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
