XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: gordon@address.invalid   
      
   "ALP = Arrogance, Lies & Pretence"  wrote:   
      
   >On 20/04/2013 1:17 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote:   
   >> On Apr 19, 4:26 am, Dechucka ltdechu  wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>> "Sanders Kaufman"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:kkqn81$474$10@wieslauf.sub.de...   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 4/18/2013 2:56 PM, wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>>> .... something as simple as universal background checks couldn't be   
   >>>>> passed. Maybe the US is just a sick and violent society   
   >>>   
   >>>> That's better than being a effeminate cunt like you who wants to take it   
   >>>> in the shorts rather than keep your Constitutional rights. You shouldn't   
   >>>> think so hard, your brain will just hurt.   
   >>>   
   >>> How would background checks hinder your 2A rights apart from keeping   
   >>> guns out of the hands of some criminals and psychos   
   >>>   
   >> Clue us in, Dechucka: tell us _exactly_ how a "universal background   
   >> check" would "keep guns out of the hands of some criminals and   
   >> psychos."   
   >>   
   >> Better yet, tell us how a "UBC" would "keep guns out of the hands of   
   >> ANY criminals or ANY psychos."   
   >>   
   >> BTW, Dechucka; have you recovered yet from that bout you had with Mad   
   >> Cow Disease back in `04?   
   >>   
   >   
   >Dumbfucka is a combination of ignorance and leftist control freak. We   
   >will have a million CCTV cameras per square mile/kilometre before they   
   >admit that monitoring the general population is a waste of time. In the   
   >process they will dream up all sorts of reasons to maintain their   
   >surveillance of the general population.   
   >   
   >Of course terrs and crims will easily evade all of their measures.   
      
   The bombers in Boston and the murderer of Jill Meagher in Melbourne   
   were found rapidly because of security cameras in the area. In both   
   cases they were filmed on privately owned cameras. If you are arguing   
   that official security cameras are a waste of resources you are   
   probably right. There are so many private security cameras and mobile   
   phone cameras that extra ones are not likely to make a difference.   
   In addition, I think it is preferable to restrict the official   
   surveillance because a central source of videos is more likely to be   
   misused.   
   >   
   >Stupidity is inherently self-limiting.   
      
   Alas, no.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)