XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   news:X82dnbWs6_TRkO7MnZ2dnUVZ_jydnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >   
   > "SaPeIsMa"  wrote in message   
   > news:kkupmi$r01$2@dont-email.me...   
   >> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >> news:tMydnZdamsdvTuzMnZ2dnUVZ_qydnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>   
   >>> "Scout"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:kksjok$142$2@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "Trevor Wilson"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:ate000Fek8tU2@mid.individual.net...   
   >>>>> On 4/20/2013 8:39 AM, Dechucka wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>> news:XnsA1A782B5E82D8hopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >>>>>>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:atc1j0F11bvU1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On 4/19/2013 7:56 AM, Dechucka wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> .... something as simple as universal background checks couldn't   
   >>>>>>>>> be   
   >>>>>>>>> passed. Maybe the US is just a sick and violent society   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> **Not so much. The US is saddled with a bunch of gutless   
   >>>>>>>> politicians,   
   >>>>>>>> who value the opinions of the NRA more than their constituents. The   
   >>>>>>>> majority of Americans are probably disgusted with their elected   
   >>>>>>>> senators. They need to be reminded of just how weak these creatures   
   >>>>>>> are.   
   >>>>>>>> They're not interested in the well-being of the American people.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> They are interested in re-election.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> sad, so election is more important than dead Americans   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> **It would seem so. Except to a tiny handful of Republican senators   
   >>>>> and the majority of Democrat senators. Americans should keep those   
   >>>>> names in mind. Both the brave ones and the gutless ones.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Yep, the ones that voted for it need to go, and the ones the opposed it   
   >>>> need to stay unless we have someone better.   
   >>>   
   >>> Why? Do you have a problem with background checks so some guns are kept   
   >>> out  of the hands of people the law says shouldn't have them?   
   >>   
   >> Too bad there is NOTHING to show that they would do anything like that.   
   > > Oh well   
   >>    Idiots like you don't need EVIDENCE to support your beliefs.   
   >>   
   >   
   > why don't you think it would work?   
   >   
      
   Did the current set work for Lanza, Cho, Loughner, and all the other   
   criminals who used guns to commit crimes   
   But since YOU claim that gun-control works, it's YOUR job to prove it   
       So go ahead   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)