XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
> "F Murtz" wrote in message
> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...
>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just because you have results doesn't make the law good and sane.
>>>
>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun thefts are
>>> dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of firearms have completely
>>> ceased.
>>
>>
>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.
>>
>>
>>
>> Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996 gun
>>> control laws were a good change.
>>
>>
>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.
>>
>
> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't changed
> The fact that "murders by guns" prove them right.
**PROVE that the total number has not changed.
PROVE that the same number of people would have been murdered, if the
1996 gun control law changes had not been enacted.
In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18 years prior to
the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13 mass murders committed
via the use of firearms in Australia and that since 1996, there have
been none.
>
> But then that is the logic of imbeciles.
**The logic of imbeciles is this:
* Everything the NRA says is correct and in the best interests of the US
public.
* That good, sane HOMOGENEOUS gun control laws will not lead to a
reduction in firearm related homicide.
* That background checks on ALL gun sales will not reduce the number of
firearms in the hands of criminals.
--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
