Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.talk.guns    |    Discussion of gun ownership in Canada    |    54,497 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 53,097 of 54,497    |
|    F Murtz to Trevor Wilson    |
|    Re: Boston Bombing, more people died tha    |
|    24 Apr 13 22:19:36    |
      XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics       XPost: talk.politics.guns       From: haggisz@hotmail.com              Trevor Wilson wrote:       > On 4/24/2013 11:44 AM, F Murtz wrote:       >> Trevor Wilson wrote:       >>       >>>       >>>       >>> Just because you have results doesn't make the law good and sane.       >>>       >>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun thefts are       >>> dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of firearms have completely       >>> ceased.       >>       >>       >> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.       >       > **It has, but since Australians rarely use firearms to commit murder,       > the total change will always be much smaller. In any case the 1996 gun       > control laws were desiged to deal with the crime of mass murder, via the       > use of guns. In that respect the 1996 gun control laws, introduced by       > the Howard government, can be judged as a tremendous success.       >       > The US is very different. More than 60% of US homicides involve the use       > of firearms. As a consequence, any reduction in the availability of       > firearms to undesirables, is likely to cause a far greater reduction in       > total homicides. Of course, as long as the NRA controls the Republicans       > and remains unanswerable to the US people, the killing will continue       > unabated.       >       >>       >>       >>       >> Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996 gun       >>> control laws were a good change.       >>       >>       >> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.       >>       >       > **You need to prove that. In your proof, you should care to note that in       > the 18 years prior to the Howard gun control law changes, there were 13       > mass murders, comitted via the use of firearms. Since 1996, there have       > been none, nada, zip, zero incidences.       >       > Seems like a good thing to me.       >       >       You keep on and on inexorably about mass gun murders which play so       little part in the great scheme of things as to be almost non existent              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca