XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: haggisz@hotmail.com   
      
   Dechucka wrote:   
   >   
   > "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   > news:klda5d$v1n$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> Dechucka wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>> "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:klcr0g$5t8$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 4/25/2013 2:59 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 10:21 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>> "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   Just because you have results doesn't make the law good and   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> sane.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> thefts are   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of firearms have   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> completely   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> ceased.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>  Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996 gun   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> control laws were a good change.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't changed   
   >>>>>>>>>>     The fact that "murders by guns" prove them right.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> **PROVE that the total number has not changed.   
   >>>>>>>>> PROVE that the same number of people would have been murdered, if   
   >>>>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>>>> 1996 gun control law changes had not been enacted.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18 years   
   >>>>>>>>> prior to   
   >>>>>>>>> the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13 mass murders   
   >>>>>>>>> committed   
   >>>>>>>>> via the use of firearms in Australia and that since 1996, there   
   >>>>>>>>> have   
   >>>>>>>>> been none.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> No mass gun murders but there have been mass murders by other means   
   >>>>>>>> which the gun laws did nothing to stop.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> **Are you a complete moron, or are you permanently drunk?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Do DUI laws stop people from being raped?   
   >>>>>>> Do laws pertaining to bank robbery stop people from driving whilst   
   >>>>>>> drunk?   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Gun control laws are designed to address GUN RELATED crimes, you   
   >>>>>>> idiot.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Only a moron would think that making a law that inconveniences a   
   >>>>>> lot of   
   >>>>>> people for almost no purpose factually to address such a miniscule   
   >>>>>> problem in the total homicide statistic is the most wonderful thing   
   >>>>>> since sliced bread   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> **That's just it: It doesn't inconvenience people.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> It does me that is why I can no longer  participate in the only sport I   
   >>>> had   
   >>>   
   >>> How did US background check laws effect your sport   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> I am posting from an aus. NG about australian laws.   
   >   
   > ok you've changed the topic. cool   
   Only as a result of trevor making stupid statements on australian laws.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)