home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.talk.guns      Discussion of gun ownership in Canada      54,497 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 53,121 of 54,497   
   Trevor Wilson to F Murtz   
   Re: Boston Bombing, more people died tha   
   26 Apr 13 13:46:18   
   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au   
      
   On 4/26/2013 1:10 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   > Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >> On 4/25/2013 2:59 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>> On 4/24/2013 10:21 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   Just because you have results doesn't make the law good and   
   >>>>>>>>> sane.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun thefts   
   >>>>>>>>> are   
   >>>>>>>>> dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of firearms have   
   >>>>>>>>> completely   
   >>>>>>>>> ceased.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>  Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996 gun   
   >>>>>>>>> control laws were a good change.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't changed   
   >>>>>>>     The fact that "murders by guns" prove them right.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> **PROVE that the total number has not changed.   
   >>>>>> PROVE that the same number of people would have been murdered, if the   
   >>>>>> 1996 gun control law changes had not been enacted.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18 years   
   >>>>>> prior to   
   >>>>>> the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13 mass murders   
   >>>>>> committed   
   >>>>>> via the use of firearms in Australia and that since 1996, there have   
   >>>>>> been none.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> No mass gun murders but there have been mass murders by other means   
   >>>>> which the gun laws did nothing to stop.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> **Are you a complete moron, or are you permanently drunk?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Do DUI laws stop people from being raped?   
   >>>> Do laws pertaining to bank robbery stop people from driving whilst   
   >>>> drunk?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Gun control laws are designed to address GUN RELATED crimes, you idiot.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> Only a moron would think that making a law that inconveniences a lot of   
   >>> people for almost no purpose factually to address such a miniscule   
   >>> problem in the total homicide statistic is the most wonderful thing   
   >>> since sliced bread   
   >>   
   >> **That's just it: It doesn't inconvenience people.   
   >>   
   > It does me that is why ican no longer  participate in the only sport I had   
      
   **Find another hobby.   
      
   --   
   Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca