XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: haggisz@hotmail.com   
      
   Dechucka wrote:   
   >   
   > "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   > news:klcr0g$5t8$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>> On 4/25/2013 2:59 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>> On 4/24/2013 10:21 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>>>>> "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   Just because you have results doesn't make the law good and   
   >>>>>>>>>> sane.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun   
   >>>>>>>>>> thefts are   
   >>>>>>>>>> dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of firearms have   
   >>>>>>>>>> completely   
   >>>>>>>>>> ceased.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>  Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996 gun   
   >>>>>>>>>> control laws were a good change.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't changed   
   >>>>>>>>     The fact that "murders by guns" prove them right.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> **PROVE that the total number has not changed.   
   >>>>>>> PROVE that the same number of people would have been murdered, if   
   >>>>>>> the   
   >>>>>>> 1996 gun control law changes had not been enacted.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18 years   
   >>>>>>> prior to   
   >>>>>>> the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13 mass murders   
   >>>>>>> committed   
   >>>>>>> via the use of firearms in Australia and that since 1996, there have   
   >>>>>>> been none.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> No mass gun murders but there have been mass murders by other means   
   >>>>>> which the gun laws did nothing to stop.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> **Are you a complete moron, or are you permanently drunk?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Do DUI laws stop people from being raped?   
   >>>>> Do laws pertaining to bank robbery stop people from driving whilst   
   >>>>> drunk?   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Gun control laws are designed to address GUN RELATED crimes, you   
   >>>>> idiot.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>> Only a moron would think that making a law that inconveniences a lot of   
   >>>> people for almost no purpose factually to address such a miniscule   
   >>>> problem in the total homicide statistic is the most wonderful thing   
   >>>> since sliced bread   
   >>>   
   >>> **That's just it: It doesn't inconvenience people.   
   >>>   
   >> It does me that is why I can no longer  participate in the only sport I   
   >> had   
   >   
   > How did US background check laws effect your sport   
      
      
   I am posting from an aus. NG about australian laws.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)