XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns
From: trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au
On 4/28/2013 1:15 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
> "SaPeIsMa" wrote in
> news:klgc61$5p1$4@dont-email.me:
>
>> "RD Sandman" wrote in message
>> news:XnsA1AE7951F463Bhopewell@216.196.121.131...
>>> Trevor Wilson wrote in
>>> news:atts09Fu2eeU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> On 4/26/2013 7:49 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote in
>>>>> news:attl3lFsi9eU2@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/25/2013 2:59 PM, F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 10:21 PM, F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "F Murtz" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just because you have results doesn't make the law good
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and sane.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down. Gun
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thefts are dramatically down. Mass murders, via the use of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> firearms have completely
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ceased.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total murders.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that the 1996
>>>>>>>>>>>> gun
>>>>>>>>>>>>> control laws were a good change.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't changed
>>>>>>>>>>> The fact that "murders by guns" prove them right.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> **PROVE that the total number has not changed.
>>>>>>>>>> PROVE that the same number of people would have been murdered,
>>>>>>>>>> if the 1996 gun control law changes had not been enacted.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18 years
>>>>>>>>>> prior to the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13 mass
>>>>>>>>>> murders committed via the use of firearms in Australia and
>>>>>>>>>> that since 1996, there have been none.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No mass gun murders but there have been mass murders by other
>>>>>>>>> means which the gun laws did nothing to stop.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> **Are you a complete moron, or are you permanently drunk?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do DUI laws stop people from being raped?
>>>>>>>> Do laws pertaining to bank robbery stop people from driving
>>>>>>>> whilst drunk?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Gun control laws are designed to address GUN RELATED crimes, you
>>>>>>>> idiot.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Only a moron would think that making a law that inconveniences a
>>>>>>> lot of people for almost no purpose factually to address such a
>>>>>>> miniscule problem in the total homicide statistic is the most
>>>>>>> wonderful thing since sliced bread
>>>>>>
>>>>>> **That's just it: It doesn't inconvenience people.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That depends on your viewpoint. If someone wishes to purchase
>>>>> certain firearms or accessories, it would have inconvenienced them.
>>>>> You don't think it inconveniences people simply because you weren't
>>>>> in the targeted group.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> **From your words, we can infer that you consider a minor
>>>> inconvenience, for a minority of people, worth trading the deaths of
>>>> 10,000 people for.
>>>>
>>>> Disgusting.
>>>>
>>>
>>> NO, what is disgusting is assholes like you trying to twist comments
>>> into something they are not. Trying to put your words into someone
>>> else's mouth.
>>>
>>
>> Notice that he has no problems with the "convenience" traded for the
>> deaths of far more people when it comes to other things like cars,
>> etc..
>>
>>
>>
>
> Pretty much true.
>
**Another lie from you. I suggest you check back though previous posts.
--
Trevor Wilson www.rageaudio.com.au
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
