home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.talk.guns      Discussion of gun ownership in Canada      54,497 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 53,134 of 54,497   
   Trevor Wilson to RD Sandman   
   Re: Boston Bombing, more people died tha   
   29 Apr 13 13:02:39   
   
   XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: trevor@SPAMBLOCKrageaudio.com.au   
      
   On 4/29/2013 12:24 PM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   > Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   > news:au5gnbFkqufU1@mid.individual.net:   
   >   
   >> On 4/29/2013 6:08 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>> news:au356iF4rk6U1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 4/28/2013 9:05 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>>>> news:au2vt3F3okfU2@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 4/28/2013 1:15 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>>>>> "SaPeIsMa"  wrote in   
   >>>>>>> news:klgc61$5p1$4@dont-email.me:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> "RD Sandman"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>> news:XnsA1AE7951F463Bhopewell@216.196.121.131...   
   >>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>> news:atts09Fu2eeU1@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> On 4/26/2013 7:49 AM, RD Sandman wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson  wrote in   
   >>>>>>>>>>> news:attl3lFsi9eU2@mid.individual.net:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/25/2013 2:59 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 10:21 PM, F Murtz wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/24/2013 1:26 PM, SaPeIsMa wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "F Murtz"  wrote in message   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> news:kl7d83$rib$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trevor Wilson wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        Just because you have results doesn't make the   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        law   
   >>>>> good   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        and sane.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **We have good results. Gun related crimes are down.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gun thefts are dramatically down. Mass murders, via   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the use of firearms have completely   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ceased.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Too bad It has not had the same effect on total   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> murders.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       Therefore, a reasonable person will accept that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       the 1996 gun   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> control laws were a good change.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Has not changed the status quo discernibly.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> They don't really care that the TOTAL number hasn't   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changed   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          The fact that "murders by guns" prove them   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>          right.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> **PROVE that the total number has not changed.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PROVE that the same number of people would have been   
   >>>>> murdered,   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if the 1996 gun control law changes had not been   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> enacted.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In your proof, make reference to the fact that in the 18   
   >>>>> years   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> prior to the 1996 gun control law changes, there were 13   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mass murders committed via the use of firearms in   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Australia and that since 1996, there have been none.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No mass gun murders but there have been mass murders by   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> other means which the gun laws did nothing to stop.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> **Are you a complete moron, or are you permanently drunk?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do DUI laws stop people from being raped?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do laws pertaining to bank robbery stop people from   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> driving whilst drunk?   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gun control laws are designed to address GUN RELATED   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> crimes,   
   >>>>> you   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>> idiot.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> Only a moron would think that making a law that   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> inconveniences a lot of people for almost no purpose   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> factually to address such a miniscule problem in the total   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> homicide statistic is the most wonderful thing since sliced   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>> bread   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>> **That's just it: It doesn't inconvenience people.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>> That depends on your viewpoint.  If someone wishes to   
   >>>>>>>>>>> purchase certain firearms or accessories, it would have   
   >>>>>>>>>>> inconvenienced   
   >>>>> them.   
   >>>>>>>>>>> You don't think it inconveniences people simply because you   
   >>>>> weren't   
   >>>>>>>>>>> in the targeted group.   
   >>>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> **From your words, we can infer that you consider a minor   
   >>>>>>>>>> inconvenience, for a minority of people, worth trading the   
   >>>>>>>>>> deaths   
   >>>>> of   
   >>>>>>>>>> 10,000 people for.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>> Disgusting.   
   >>>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> NO, what is disgusting is assholes like you trying to twist   
   >>>>>>>>> comments into something they are not.  Trying to put your words   
   >>>>>>>>> into someone else's mouth.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Notice that he has no problems with the "convenience" traded for   
   >>>>>>>> the deaths of far more people  when it comes to other things   
   >>>>>>>> like cars, etc..   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Pretty much true.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> **Another lie from you. I suggest you check back though previous   
   >>>>>> posts.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Suggest all you want, it will be ignored like most of your ideas   
   >>>>> are. Fix the problems in your own country before you start harping   
   >>>>> on ours.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> **We already have.   
   >>>   
   >>> You think that was the only problem your country has?   
   >>   
   >> **Far from it. I am remaining on topic.   
   >>   
   >>>   
   >>>    Our mass murder rate, via gunshot, has stood at   
   >>>> zero for 17 years.   
   >>>   
   >>> I know.  I am the one who had to point you to the stats before and   
   >>> after Port Arthur.   
   >>>   
   >>>    Our gun thefts, from civilians, are significantly   
   >>>> down. Gun crimes are down and homicide via gunshot is down.   
   >>>   
   >>> They would be.....the number of guns available to be stolen are very   
   >>> much reduced.   
   >>   
   >> **Untrue. There are now more guns in our society today, than there   
   >> were prior to the 1996 gun control law implementation. The reason why   
   >> there are far fewer civilian guns being stolen, is due to the   
   >> mandatory storage conditions applied to gun ownership.   
   >   
   > I will take your word for it since I really don't care.  I took a quick   
   > glance at the internet but didn't find what I was looking for.  As you   
   > know, I don't live in Australia so I take little note of your politics.   
   > They aren't my business.   
   >   
      
   [continued in next message]   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca