XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns
From: sly_bacon@hotmail.com
>>>>>>> On 28/05/2013 11:50 PM, a425couple wrote:
>>>>>> "Mary Alison" wrote in message...
>>>>>>> Unfree Kingdom bans all guns, and now no one can defend themselves
>>>>>>> against
>>>>>>> a beheading of a soldier in the street, in broad daylight! Bloody
>>>>>>> murder!---
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ... The right of self-defense is the first law of
>>>>>>> nature; in most governments it has been the study of rulers to
>>>>>>> confine
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> right within the narrowest limits possible. Whenever standing armies
>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>> kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under
>>>>>>> any
>>>>>>> color or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already
>>>>>>> annihilated, is on the brink of destruction. - St. George Tucker,
>>>>>>> Blackstone's Commentaries on the Laws of England (1803) ( From which
>>>>>>> U.S.
>>>>>>> laws regarding the RKBA ( Human Right to Keep & Bear Arms )
>>>>>>> derrived )
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, the US situation owes a lot to what great English
>>>>>> thinkers like Blackstone and John Locke wrote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their
>>>>>>> defence
>>>>>>> suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law; ..." - English
>>>>>>> Bill of
>>>>>>> Rights 1689
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not a real clear bright line, is it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> By the way, what country are you in?
>>>>>
>>>>> "keithr" wrote: Lalaland
>>>>>
>>>> Truebrit wrote:
>>>> Given the content of your posts I would say you are well situated.
>>>> Truebrit.
>>>
>>> "keithr" wrote:
>>> Not real bright at picking up context are you?
>>
>>Truebrit wrote:
>> Not real bright in knowing where the place commonly referred to as,
>> Lalaland
>> is are you?
>> Truebrit
>>
>
>"keithr" wrote: Judging by the quality of your
>arguments, it could quite possibly be the UK.
>
Epic fail on your behalf.
Truebrit.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
