XPost: uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns, aus.politics   
   XPost: talk.politics.guns   
   From: SaPeIsMa@gmail.com   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   news:X5adncOFIoGfejLMnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >   
   > "SaPeIsMa"  wrote in message   
   > news:koni0f$kb2$1@dont-email.me...   
   >> "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   >> news:7fadnXKl5cbJmDDMnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >>>   
   >>> "SaPeIsMa"  wrote in message   
   >>> news:koib2r$v62$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>>   
   >>>> LOL   
   >>>>    Actually it was addressed in the past   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 1)    Epidemiologists talking about gun control as if it was a disease   
   >>>> is nothing but proof of the old adage that "To anyone with a hammer,   
   >>>> everything is a nail."   
   >>>> Let's make it simple for the simpletons.   
   >>>> The cause of criminal use of guns is CRIMINALS and NOT the guns.   
   >>>> Chasing after guns will NOT in ANY way change the behavior of the   
   >>>> criminals   
   >>>> Anyone who believes that nonsense has to be stupid enough to believe   
   >>>> that guns make criminals behave in a criminal fashion.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> 2)    Your town hall article IN NOW WAY addresses the economic benefits   
   >>>> of people being able to defend themselves   
   >>>>        You know, simple things like people not being killed, or injured   
   >>>> by criminals   
   >>>>        You know that point where the DOJ concluded on the basis of the   
   >>>> UCR (Uniform Crime Reports) that people who defend themselves with guns   
   >>>> are far less apt to suffer serious injury or death, than people who use   
   >>>> other means or nothing at all.   
   >>>>        Once again (as usual) your are completely beside the point   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>> You really should get professional help to address why you need to   
   >>>> prove you're a complete idiot..   
   >>>   
   >>> Please address the data with a logical debate not a rant.   
   >>   
   >> I did.   
   >>    Too bad it's way too complicated for you   
   >>   
   >>> I know that  according to your logic these papers are:   
   >>>    "Just another nail in the coffin of your ignorant and dishonest   
   >>> claims."   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> Are you denying that your claims have been show ignorant and wrong, and   
   >> that you lied overtly and by omission to mislead ?   
   >   
   > yes   
   >   
      
      
   There you go lying again...   
      
      
      
      
   >>   
   >> You have no more cred left, chucklehead   
   >>   
   >   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)