XPost: talk.politics.guns, uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns   
   XPost: aus.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Murff"  wrote in message   
   news:l5fuld$o79$1@dont-email.me...   
   > On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 05:52:26 -0500, Scout wrote:   
   >   
   >> "R. LaCasse"  wrote in message   
   >> news:0ekm799m99hc15vsa2hajjk5jkgv8acc7c@4ax.com...   
   >   
   >>> Guns are good for self defense, but they are not the only tool for   
   >>> expressing your political views.....like Airport Shootings and stuff.   
   >>   
   >> Evasion noted.   
   >   
   > It isn't clear how he's "evading" anything. You pick a simple adversarial   
   > example where defensive gun use (or any other sort of violence) is   
   > clearly justified. Your simple example isn't of particular relevance to   
   > his point as your example is very specific, and his case was general.   
   >   
   > Not all adversaries are 220lb rapists. Some of them are political - gun   
   > control types for example.   
      
   True, but his assertion is that other options are always smarter to   
   use....I'm just asking him to back up that assertion with a specific   
   scenario.   
      
   Of course, you're free to show the alternatives as well.....if you can.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)