XPost: talk.politics.guns, uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns   
   XPost: aus.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Dechucka"  wrote in message   
   news:GJOdnaONPbRveubPnZ2dnUVZ_qqdnZ2d@westnet.com.au...   
   >   
   > "Scout"  wrote in message   
   > news:l5ghd7$pv6$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> "Murff"  wrote in message   
   >> news:l5gf6l$o79$2@dont-email.me...   
   >>> On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:12:47 -0500, Scout wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> "Murff"  wrote in message   
   >>>> news:l5fuld$o79$1@dont-email.me...   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Not all adversaries are 220lb rapists. Some of them are political -   
   >>>>> gun   
   >>>>> control types for example.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> True, but his assertion is that other options are always smarter to   
   >>>> use....I'm just asking him to back up that assertion with a specific   
   >>>> scenario.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Of course, you're free to show the alternatives as well.....if you can.   
   >>>   
   >>> Certainly relying solely on DGU is unwise. Working from the first rule   
   >>> of   
   >>> gunfights being to bring a gun, what if she can't for local legal   
   >>> reasons ?   
   >>   
   >> Has nothing to do with the assertion made.....   
   >>   
   >>    
   >   
   > I can think of a few non lethal options, hairspray to the eyes, mace, or a   
   > good testicle tasering   
      
   But are you willing to rely on them to prevent your rape and, if you fail,   
   your murder?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)