XPost: talk.politics.guns, uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns   
   XPost: aus.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Murff"  wrote in message   
   news:l5iql0$o79$8@dont-email.me...   
   > On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 07:55:33 -0500, Scout wrote:   
   >   
   >>> 1. We had a point that guns are not the smartest way to deal with   
   >>> problems.   
   >>   
   >> Bzzzzzttttttttttt   
   >>   
   >   
   > *YAWN*   
   >   
   > To reiterate:   
   >   
   > I return to my assertion that resort to firearms or other violently   
   > incapacitating force on humans may be necessary in extreme cases, but is   
   > not the smartest outcome - it indicates somewhere along the line at least   
   > one, and maybe many, prior failures.   
   >   
   > Your objection is, what ?   
      
   That this assertion not the assertion being challenged.   
      
   A specific claim was made, and I challenged that specific claim. Not some   
   other claim you've made up, or one in which you've altered the condition but   
   the SPECIFIC CLAIM MADE.   
      
   Got it?   
      
   Try again when you can deal with the actual claim that was made.   
      
   IOW, quit trying the change the subject, move the goalposts or otherwise   
   alter what the conversation is about.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)