XPost: talk.politics.guns, uk.politics.guns, aus.politics.guns   
   XPost: aus.politics.guns   
   From: me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net   
      
   "Murff"  wrote in message   
   news:l5q4i3$o79$14@dont-email.me...   
   > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:59:07 -0500, Scout wrote:   
   >   
   >> "Murff"  wrote in message   
   >> news:l5mdvl$o79$9@dont-email.me...   
   >>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2013 09:24:29 -0500, Scout wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>>> A specific claim was made, and I challenged that specific claim.   
   >>>   
   >>> No, you didn't.   
   >>   
   >> Yes, I did, and you jumped in and immediately started to try to move the   
   >> goal posts.   
   >   
   > So you assume that any point that doesn't fit comfortably with your   
   > prejudices is "moving the goalposts". Not an uncommon view. Not an   
   > interesting one either.   
      
   No, I assume that any changes to the conditions set by the assertion I'm   
   challenging is moving the goal posts. Which it is.   
      
   Now, we've been going on with this for a bit now, and you seem unable to   
   defend the actual statement made.   
      
   If you can not do so, then you're just wasting my time. So either defend his   
   statement or I will move on.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)