Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.talk.guns    |    Discussion of gun ownership in Canada    |    54,497 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 53,414 of 54,497    |
|    rbowman to All    |
|    Re: Connecticut Moves One Step Closer To    |
|    27 Feb 14 20:01:15    |
      XPost: alt.survival, alt.guns, talk.politics.guns       From: bowman@montana.com               wrote:              > Except for the state line bit, yes. If home state FFLS were involved       > then they were still legal.              I may be compressing the time scale but that weekend it would be perfectly       legal for a California citizen to purchase a SKS rifle with a detachable       magazine in AZ and bring it home. The next weekend, it would not have been.       But then they decided fixed magazines were evil too.              http://www.wnd.com/1999/07/3745/              http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roberti-       Roos_Assault_Weapons_Control_Act_of_1989              The Roberti-Roos Act is a classic example of trying to write a law where       'banned' if defined by whatever makes some gungrabber piss themselves.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca