XPost: alt.law-enforcement.lethal-force, alt.law-enforcement.corruption,   
   alt.government.abuse   
   XPost: alt.guns, alt.rec.guns   
   From: a425couple@hotmail.com   
      
   "Me"  wrote in message   
   > Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 13:18:16 -0700   
   > From: "Clive Edwards"   
   > Subject: One shooter, multiple armed opponents.   
   >   
   > I suppose Tony Bernardo believes that our current scheme of gun control is   
   > acceptable and effective and all we need to do now is "identify people who   
   > have mental health issues",  I believe Obama has that sussed in the US.   
   > Perhaps we can adopt that measure up here and it would be effective.  Both   
   > American and Canadian (not to mention British, Australian, Kiwi and other)   
   > gun control fanatics believe allowing oneself to hold a gun, let alone own   
   > one, makes a person mentally ill.  Thanks for the friendly fire, Tony.   
   >   
   > Every time we get all weepy and emotional over a shooting we are sinking   
   > to   
   > the anti gun crowd's level.  We can't win anything that way, except the   
   > disdain of those anti's who know rational thought is their enemy. At least   
   > this time the target wasn't unarmed women, children or (heaven forbid)   
   > Jews   
   > for a change.  If the anti's thought about the episode for a moment they   
   > could argue that having guns and training (and probably body armour)   
   > didn't   
   > help the cops, so what makes us think having guns would help us?  I guess   
   > they don't want to go there any more than we do.   
      
   I'm not sure what event was your "this time".   
   Having a gun (or even guns) does not mean you will always win.   
   But it does improve the odds, if you act properly!   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)