Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.talk.guns    |    Discussion of gun ownership in Canada    |    54,497 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 53,766 of 54,497    |
|    AlleyCat to All    |
|    "Fag" Wayne Lapierre Wants You To Step U    |
|    07 Jan 16 12:52:03    |
      XPost: uk.politics.misc, uk.politics.guns       From: AlleyCatDavis@ymail.com              (Wayne no longer stands for background checks and psych exams       to get a gun permit, probably because of what they would find       in his closet. He's batshit crazy.)                     Based on the hysterical hyperbole spilling out the mouth of       National Rifle Association honcho Wayne LaPierre like too much       verbal diarrhea, one would assume the average American and       potential gun owner is a gutless coward who needs a firearm to       shoot anything in sight.              LaPierre, long an embarrassment to anyone with an IQ over that       of an average vegetable, is edging more and more into the realm       of uncontrollable madman, a raving lunatic who seems to want       everyone in schools armed, even elementary school kids, and who       describes a frightened America filled with citizens cowering in       fear in their homes waiting to shoot anyone who walks in the       door.              OK, LaPierre hasn’t advocated arming elementary kids. Not yet,       but based on some of his senseless ramblings, such an idea may       be in the back of his head.              At the annual gathering of gun fanciers who genuflect to the       NRA’s propaganda, LaPierre claimed an armed America could have       prevented the bombings at the Boston marathon and talked about       the need to arm even granny to keep her safe in her home.              Which raises an interesting — and disturbing — question. Is       the target audience of LaPierre and his inate ramblings a       citizen who really needs self protection or is it a collection       of paranoid cowards who need guns to establish some vague       concept of manhood (and womanhood since NRA these days is       targeting women)?              I’ve known LaPierre for more than 30 years and he has always       been a hysterical, paranoid egomaniac who plays well to the       insane fears of the average gun nut. In his view, America is       best served by a population of gun toting masses walking down       the street with firearms strapped to their sides as a deterrent       to what he sees as a teeming sea of robbers, looters and street       thugs.              Arming the masses, the told the NRA convention in Houston,       could have prevented the bombings in Boston. How? He doesn’t       say, but knowing Wayne, he probably sees deterrence as allowing       anyone to shoot randomly at anyone toting a backpack on a       public street.              While this kind of hysteria ignores common sense and the       dangers of too many guns in the hands of too many nut cases, it       plays well with the hysterical average member of the National       Rifle Association.              He suggested most Bostonians withed they had carried a gun at       the Boston Marathon last month.              And done what? Fired at anything that moved? Most Bostonians       want nothing to do with guns.              He talked about “frightened” people living in fear in their       homes. Really? Where? Who?              Such inanity does nothing to bring reason to the needed debate       over the proliferation of guns in our society and the increase       of violence that leaves too many people dead or wounded.              After watching LaPierre’s latest tirade at this past weekend’s       NRA gathering, I now understand why the association is fighting       so hard to prevent expansion of background checks and increased       looks at the mental history of those who purchase guns.              Such a law would prevent crazy loons like Wayne LaPierre or a       lot of the other lunatics who run the NRA from ever legally       obtaining or owning firearms.              And that alone is the best argument for expanding background       checks.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca