XPost: can.politics, sac.politics, talk.politics.misc
From: kguhne@aim.com
In article <8f5babpskom38vkgfpvnkv7namj7a0mn9e@4ax.com>
gordo wrote:
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 02:48:02 GMT, Nobody wrote:
>
> >Ericİ wrote:
> >
> >> Nobody wrote...
> >>>
> >>> Dave Smith wrote:
> >>> > Did I say that the kid who they caught was guilty before his
> >>> > trial? I said the (alleged) shooter who was caught was 17 and
> >>> > would not serve much time in jail. There were plenty of
> >>> > witnesses who saw the 17 year old do the shooting that killed
> >>> > his two brothers and two staff members and wounded a number of
> >>> > other people. If you want to argue that he is innocent,
> >>> > despite all the eyewitnesses, feel free. It won't be the first
> >>> > time you have made a fool of yourself here.
> >>> >
> >>> > I trust you realize that at 17 he is too young to have a PAL
> >>> > and therefore could not legally own a firearm and that is only
> >>> > one of many gun control regulations violated, not to mention
> >>> > that it is illegal to shoot people. I have stated many times
> >>> > that it is better to prosecute criminals for their violent acts
> >>> > than to hassle law abiding citizens.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am beginning to think that gordo is just posting stupidity to
> >>> get a reaction.
> >>> Surely he can't truly be this much of an an idiot.
> >>
> >> gordo is right in that the alleged murderer has to be found guilty
> >> in a trial before being called a murderer or a criminal.
> >>
> >> But that never stopped the two-faced gordo from calling other
> >> people criminals, even if they haven't been charged with anything.
> >
> >I have a tough time using the word alleged when they catch the guy
> >with the gun in hand and still ready to shoot more.
> >Still, you are correct he isn't technically guilty until there has
> >been a trial even if it is just a formality.
>
> He is not guilty until proven guilty and it is not a technicality. It
> is the law in Canada, unless it is a 15 year old child, who spent his
> childhood in a cage in Cuba and Harper decides that US law is more
> important then a Canadian child caught up in a war he knew little
> about.
Apples and oranges. If the kid had pointed his weapon at
someone else who was armed, you'd be pissing and moaning about
his dead body now.
> The alleged person who cannot be named has not been proven guilty. You
> are a nobody who hides inside his sheet as the KKK do in Alabama.
The KKK was formed by democrats, otherwise known as American
liberals.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
