XPost: can.politics   
   From: sharx35@hotmail.com   
      
   "Alan Bowler"  wrote in message   
   news:hoiov5$24p$1@news.eternal-september.org...   
   > On 3/26/2010 4:47 AM, Sharx35 wrote:   
   >> They could have REFUSED to pay the bullshit severance that YOU defend   
   >> and let whomever was pissed off sue. They could have tied it up in the   
   >> courts for years.   
   >   
   > And they would have lost.  So in addition to the severence   
   > payments the government would be on the hook for more   
   > interest payments.  In addition, they is a high probability of   
   > the court assessing punitive damages plus the legal costs.   
   > (I.e. they would pay the lawyers fees for the staff.)   
   >   
   > The right wing is forever going on about the sanctity of   
   > contracts and how they must be honoured.  The case is   
   > a lot clearer than the "severance" routinely paid   
   > to top executives who just quit, or stay on when there   
   > is some major shuffle in the company's capital structure.   
      
   Fucking piece of shit LIEbrawl/NDP cocksucker.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)