2984e2a5
XPost: can.general, can.politics
From: Canuck57@nospam.com
On 18/04/2010 4:29 PM, Ed wrote:
> On Apr 18, 5:49 pm, "Sharx35" wrote:
>> "yp" wrote in message
>>
>> news:65f51357-1351-4b66-9290-e90ab42c3ffa@b33g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Apr 18, 11:32 am, Canuck57 wrote:
>>>> On 18/04/2010 6:41 AM, yp wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Apr 17, 8:47 pm, Canuck57 wrote:
>>>>>> In 2008 I decided I wasn't going to bust a hump to keep paying insane
>>>>>> levels of taxation like a tax-slave sheeples. When it looked like
>>>>>> Banks, GM, Chrysler& "friend of government" corporations were getting
>>>>>> debt funded taxes, I just spun out. How can the buggers be worried
>>>>>> about tooth paste at hospitals and pop so much on debtors, welshers
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> losers...
>>
>>>>>> So I decided to cut in half my annual work hours of the last 2 years.
>>>>>> I
>>>>>> now work a lot less. It feels good. Even have less stress from
>>>>>> autos,
>>>>>> only have one down from three. Pulled off 20 pounds, sleep better and
>>>>>> eat better. Even had my wife leave work (she wanted too) and now get
>>>>>> a
>>>>>> juicy dependant deduction.
>>
>>>>>> It almost seems if you work 1/2 as hard, you get 3/4th of the net
>>>>>> income. It even seems to go farther. Don't ask me how, it just does.
>>
>>>>>> Makes me wonder how many others are spinning out and getting off the
>>>>>> government tax-slave tread mill. That is, opting out of the endless
>>>>>> carrot chase.
>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Time to ask, is our government serving us or are we serving the
>>>>>> government?
>>
>>>>> Very bad example Canuck. Don't you hear all our experts saying that we
>>>>> need more productivity in Canada. In the last decade we lost badly to
>>>>> Americans and now we are about 30% less productive than them. You are
>>>>> just lazy like most Canucks and use "taxes" as an excuse. Admit it.
>>
>>>> Not enough rewards not to be lazy in this country. The system does not
>>>> motivate for productivity. Isn't a problem I can solve, so just going
>>>> to go with the flow.
>>
>>>> I hear the experts a whining, but I don't see any incentive or action.
>>>> Let the over paid fools whine and find someone else to tax for their
>>>> iodiotic theocracy of statism.
>>
>>>> But still, I out produce 75% of the people in this country, I think I
>>>> should target much less. Need to find a job in my profession that has a
>>>> 3 day work week and holidays. Think that is going to be my next goal.
>>
>>>> Good part about this is that I am learning that the less I make, I pay a
>>>> disproportial less amount of taxes and really might not need to work
>>>> paying taxes at all. Certainly don't need to work as hard as I have in
>>>> the past.
>>
>>>> If you have criticisms of this, I suggest you take it to the 70% others
>>>> in this country that produce nothing but welfare whining. As there are
>>>> only about 30% of us that work at non-government jobs and pay any
>>>> signifigant amount of income tax.
>>
>>>> And this sheeples is stepping off the treadmill.
>>>> --
>>>> Time to ask ask, is our government serving us or are we serving the
>>>> government?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>> Well don't complain then if the government brings in more and more
>>> immigrants to do the work that you refuse to do.
>>
>> Immigration SHOULD be encouraged....from countries sharing common values and
>> traditions. Australia has the right idea in this regard.
>
> I approve of Harper's changes to the immigration laws that will
> hopefully keep skilled engineers and even physicians who come here
> from developing nations like India or countries like Russia and the
> former eastern bloc, from driving taxi cabs for a living because
> their credentials aren't recognized.
As long as they really have the skills. I am sure some voodoo doctor
will claim to be a doctor from the university of no where to be found
will apply. And trusting imigration Canada to check? Fools game.
If they can fairly write the exams and papers, yes, I would agree they
shouldn't have to start at year one as many a so called professional
organizations would like. Tehy should get full credit for their valid
capabilities.
But part of the issue is governemnt wants those doctors because they be
cheaper. And I doubt as well trained. At least a 1 year fresher...to
see if they have the skills or are BSing.
> The CMA, Canadian Medical Association (the physicians union) has been
> a barrier when it comes to that, and the standards held by engineers
> in nations that are not accepted here should be evaluated on their
> own merits, not just turned down because the degrees and experience
> they hold are not from here.
But I will not argue professional organizations like this are often
biggoted. Completely possible they are better trained than our own.
> We do need immigration. But well educated and experienced people
> should not be driving taxi cabs once they immigrate here. They also
> belong at the front of the line. Most immigrants do make well,
> it's a fallacy that they don't. But the better educated they are,
> the better the chance of them contributing to Canada.
Yep, even natives were immigrants from the Alaska pan handle going back
far enough. Not a person in north or south America is truly indiginious
in the big picture.
Doesn't hurt for anyone to drive cabs for a month while the papers are
properly verified. You can learn a lot about a society driving hack as
we used to call it. Good enough for me while I was educating myself,
should be damned well good enough until their credentials and skills are
properly verfied.
But the "professionl" clubs need their chain pulled.
For doctors, an internship after the verification is a realistic
expectation. I doubt their hospitals are the same.
--
Time to ask, is our government serving us or are we serving the government?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
