XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: Canuck57@nospam.com   
      
   On 03/07/2010 10:22 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   > On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:37:30 -0700, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 03/03/2010 1:55 PM, Snoogens Murphy wrote:   
   >>> On Mar 3, 10:02 am, Marc Bissonnette   wrote:   
   >>>> Canuck57   leapt off a ten storey building. This   
   >>>> is what they screamed on the way   
   >>>> down:news:B6ujn.70473$K81.22326@newsfe18.iad:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> On 02/03/2010 7:24 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 02 Mar 2010 05:21:05 -0800, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>>> In a nutshell, "without prejudice" means the government isn't   
   >>>>>>> admitting to any fault in this matter, only that it wants this case   
   >>>>>>> to go away. Could it be because giving Chaput his day in court   
   >>>>>>> might open a Pandora's box?   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> How so?  The CRA regularly indulges in activities that are contrary   
   >>>>>> to both the spirit and letter of Canada's law.  They don't give a   
   >>>>>> shit for the laws of courts and judges: most of those have underwear   
   >>>>>> too dirty to launder.  The effect of this is to stack the ranks of   
   >>>>>> our civil service with stupid cheats (see Radwansky).   
   >>>>   
   >>>>>> Dhu   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Also why we need to forget about voting for NDP, Lib and Cons that   
   >>>>> all support this nonsense.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Because they want a minimum wage close to the $15 an hour mark (can   
   >>>> you say $5.00 Tim Hortons and McDonalds cheeseburgers?), your taxes   
   >>>> will go *through* the roof, because the NDP consistently forget that   
   >>>> someone has to , you know, actually *pay* for all their left wing   
   >>>> ideological paradise ideas.   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>> So instead we are paying for right wing ideologies.  The largest   
   >>> federal deficit in history, and now we'll be stuck with higher interest   
   >>> payments on the debt for years to come. And all because the govt is   
   >>> unwilling to balance the books! Bravo Jim!  Why pay less now when we   
   >>> can pay much more later, right?   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Adjusted for inflation, Harpo still can't beat Turdeau.  Not even close.   
   >   
   > In-country debt is not the same thing.   
      
   Yes it is.  You just put the mortgage on the taxpayer.   
      
   Debt is bad, expecially the kind of debt government has.  Think, since   
   Turdeau 33% of all federal income tax goes for a whole generation of   
   workers to interest alone, with zero return.   
      
   A you want to make it worse?  I submit you are a greedy mypoic gutter   
   snipe if you do.   
      
   You can't spend your way out of debt as a person, as a city, as a   
   province nor as the federal government.   
      
   Liberals need to face reality, it is in a head on collision with the   
   liberal idiots of Canada.   
      
   --   
   We all work for government, they ceased working for us a long time ago.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)