home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   can.taxes      All that "free" healthcare has a price      23,408 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 21,769 of 23,408   
   Duncan Patton a Campbell to Marc Bissonnette   
   Re: Canadian Taxpayers Require Bill of R   
   15 Sep 10 13:13:13   
   
   XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: campbell@neotext.ca   
      
   On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:01:34 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
      
   > Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten storey   
   > building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   > news:pan.2010.09.15.05.57.36@neotext.ca:   
   >   
   >> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:51:42 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten storey   
   >>> building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   >>> news:pan.2010.09.14.22.52.29@neotext.ca:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:34 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten   
   >>>>> storey building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   >>>>> news:pan.2010.09.14.17.45.05@neotext.ca:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:39:22 -0700, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Canadian Taxpayers Require Bill of Rights :CRA SOTW   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Taxpayers require Bill of Rights   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Vern Krishna, Financial Post ยท Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> A Bill of Rights typically entrenches rights into the law so that   
   >>>>>>> individuals can enforce them through the legal process.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Unlike Americans -- who have their Taxpayer Bill of Rights   
   >>>>>>> codified in the Internal Revenue Code--Canadian taxpayers do not   
   >>>>>>> have equivalent legal protection. Although the government has said   
   >>>>>>> that taxpayers have rights and that "the CRA take these rights   
   >>>>>>> seriously," neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals have   
   >>>>>>> enacted taxpayer rights into law. Why?   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Because the entirety of the CRA's operations are extra-legal, and   
   >>>>>> have no basis in law.  Canadians are beholden to pay what taxes the   
   >>>>>> government requires, but the collectors are purely criminal.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Before commenting, let me see if I understand you correctly: Are you   
   >>>>> saying that the taxing of Canadians is illegal and should not be   
   >>>>> done ?   
   >   
   >>>> You clearly need to take some remedial English lessons.   
   >   
   >>> Ah, avoidance of question. Gotcha. So you're one of those conspiracy   
   >>> theorists that's convinced the gubm't it out to git yah.   
   >   
   >> I will repeat myself, since you clearly cannot not parse the relevant   
   >> words:   
   >   
   >> "Canadians are beholden to pay what taxes the government requires".   
   >   
   >> I spent the night of September 11, 2001 in gaol for not having *signed*   
   >> my tax forms because it IS AGAINST MY RELIGION TO SWEAR OATHS (which is   
   >> what their forms *used* to say).   
   >   
   >> Note that I was not up for tax evasion and eventually the CRA had to   
   >> return some 15 thousand dollars of the sixty or so that I had OVERPAID   
   >> over the years because I believe taxes NEED to be paid.   
   >   
   >> I took a beating over it and got to enjoy the company of a couple of   
   >> gaolhouse rats who wanted to know why I hate Chinese-Scottish fags and   
   >> Hell's Angels, amongst other things. The GOC may not be out to get me   
   >> but some of it's uncivil servants most assuredly are.   
   >   
   >> I suspect that it is because I made the mistake of telling some shit   
   >> who worked for the CRA (it was passing itself off as police of some   
   >> kind) that the women being murdered in Vancouver were being fed to pigs   
   >> because the pork in my local Super Value sometimes taste of monkey and   
   >> ambergris.  That was the winter of '97/8.   
   >   
   >> Now go fuck yourself you illiterate scumbag.   
   >   
   >>> Right, so you can be safely ignored, then.   
   >   
   >>> Carry on.   
   >   
   > Oh, so you're a particularly *dense* conspiracy theorist that thinks the   
   > gubm't is out to git yah. Thanks for the clarification.   
      
      
   And you are nothing more than an apologist for evil.   
      
      
   Dhu   
      
      
   --   
   Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca