XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: campbell@neotext.ca   
      
   On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:46:52 +0000, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 13:13:13 +0000, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:01:34 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten storey   
   >>> building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   >>> news:pan.2010.09.15.05.57.36@neotext.ca:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 21:51:42 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten   
   >>>>> storey building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   >>>>> news:pan.2010.09.14.22.52.29@neotext.ca:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:19:34 -0500, Marc Bissonnette wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Duncan Patton a Campbell  leapt off a ten   
   >>>>>>> storey building. This is what they screamed on the way down:   
   >>>>>>> news:pan.2010.09.14.17.45.05@neotext.ca:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 07:39:22 -0700, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Canadian Taxpayers Require Bill of Rights :CRA SOTW   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Taxpayers require Bill of Rights   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Vern Krishna, Financial Post · Wednesday, Sept. 8, 2010   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> A Bill of Rights typically entrenches rights into the law so   
   >>>>>>>>> that individuals can enforce them through the legal process.   
   >>>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>> Unlike Americans -- who have their Taxpayer Bill of Rights   
   >>>>>>>>> codified in the Internal Revenue Code--Canadian taxpayers do not   
   >>>>>>>>> have equivalent legal protection. Although the government has   
   >>>>>>>>> said that taxpayers have rights and that "the CRA take these   
   >>>>>>>>> rights seriously," neither the Conservatives nor the Liberals   
   >>>>>>>>> have enacted taxpayer rights into law. Why?   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Because the entirety of the CRA's operations are extra-legal, and   
   >>>>>>>> have no basis in law.  Canadians are beholden to pay what taxes   
   >>>>>>>> the government requires, but the collectors are purely criminal.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Before commenting, let me see if I understand you correctly: Are   
   >>>>>>> you saying that the taxing of Canadians is illegal and should not   
   >>>>>>> be done ?   
   >>>   
   >>>>>> You clearly need to take some remedial English lessons.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Ah, avoidance of question. Gotcha. So you're one of those conspiracy   
   >>>>> theorists that's convinced the gubm't it out to git yah.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I will repeat myself, since you clearly cannot not parse the relevant   
   >>>> words:   
   >>>   
   >>>> "Canadians are beholden to pay what taxes the government requires".   
   >>>   
   >>>> I spent the night of September 11, 2001 in gaol for not having   
   >>>> *signed* my tax forms because it IS AGAINST MY RELIGION TO SWEAR   
   >>>> OATHS (which is what their forms *used* to say).   
   >>>   
   >>>> Note that I was not up for tax evasion and eventually the CRA had to   
   >>>> return some 15 thousand dollars of the sixty or so that I had   
   >>>> OVERPAID over the years because I believe taxes NEED to be paid.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I took a beating over it and got to enjoy the company of a couple of   
   >>>> gaolhouse rats who wanted to know why I hate Chinese-Scottish fags   
   >>>> and Hell's Angels, amongst other things. The GOC may not be out to   
   >>>> get me but some of it's uncivil servants most assuredly are.   
   >>>   
   >>>> I suspect that it is because I made the mistake of telling some shit   
   >>>> who worked for the CRA (it was passing itself off as police of some   
   >>>> kind) that the women being murdered in Vancouver were being fed to   
   >>>> pigs because the pork in my local Super Value sometimes taste of   
   >>>> monkey and ambergris.  That was the winter of '97/8.   
   >>>   
   >>>> Now go fuck yourself you illiterate scumbag.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Right, so you can be safely ignored, then.   
   >>>   
   >>>>> Carry on.   
   >>>   
   >>> Oh, so you're a particularly *dense* conspiracy theorist that thinks   
   >>> the gubm't is out to git yah. Thanks for the clarification.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> And you are nothing more than an apologist for evil.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >> Dhu   
   >   
   > To elaborate, prostitutes don't pay taxes so it's JUST FINE BY THE CRA   
   > to murder them and feed them to the hogs.  I'm just an unfortunate   
   > bystander who happened to observe their iniquity.   
   >   
   > There gonna need to be a pay back, ya know.   
   >   
   > Dhu   
      
   And it's going to be like the Poop is going to find out:   
   some slaughtered scape-goats and mumbled lipservice just   
   won't cut it.  We're playing by Nuremburg Rulz now.   
      
   Dhu   
      
      
   --   
   Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu >>> Ne Obliviscaris   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)