XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: Canuck57@nospam.com   
      
   On 05/06/2011 10:20 PM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   > On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:02:22 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 05/06/2011 4:07 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   >>> On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:30:12 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> On 03/06/2011 10:43 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   >>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2011 23:06:40 -0600, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>>> On 31/05/2011 8:57 AM, Duncan Patton a Campbell wrote:   
   >>>>>>> On Tue, 31 May 2011 06:21:04 -0700, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> The teachers work at a school on the Waterhen Lake First Nation,   
   >>>>>>>> near Meadow Lake, about 300 kilometres north of Saskatoon.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Some of them live in accommodations supplied by the reserve and   
   >>>>>>>> pay $250 per month in rent, a rate that is below market level for   
   >>>>>>>> housing in nearby communities such as Meadow Lake.   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> That's no benefit, that's a hardship.  And after the debacle with   
   >>>>>>> those Residential Schools, there's no question that it's the GoC's   
   >>>>>>> responsibility to deliver education to people *in situ*.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Dhu   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Not at all hardship, I am sure the salary is healthy.   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>> $alary only goes so far when it comes to no running water and   
   >>>>> outhouses in 50 below.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Agreed, just like every taxpayer slave in the country knows.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But your point?  If the reserve is her primary residence, then it is   
   >>>> subsidized.  There isn't a reserve in Canada that isn't subsidized   
   >>>> that I am aware of.  So pay up.   
   >>>   
   >>> They're subsidized under a modality that keeps them "wards of the   
   >>> State", which amounts to just enough charity that they can't afford to   
   >>> do anything. So life out on a lot of the deep-bush reserves and   
   >>> settlements is pretty grim and it amounts to real hardship for folk   
   >>> from there, let alone someone brought in to teach.   
   >>   
   >> Funny, per capita they get more than retirees, disabled and many vets.   
   >>   
   >> But see what your coming from, a fostered culture of perpetual   
   >> dysfunction.  No one is forcing them to live in the remote areas.   
   >>   
   >>>> As a big fat liberal sized government teaching over paid teacher, they   
   >>>> have to realize big government has to be paid for.  Otherwise they are   
   >>>> just irrational mooches and leaches.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> The sad fact in Canada is we don't really teach civics, taxation and   
   >>>> economics, we have K12 brainwashing, big liberal sized government is   
   >>>   
   >>> I'd teach people Maths, Language(s), Science and Arts.  That's called a   
   >>> "Liberal" education.  Practicum such as taxation and "economics" should   
   >>> be left to the private interests concerned with them.  Similarly for   
   >>> "civics", which sounds to me a lot like State Religion despite all its   
   >>> seeming good intent.   
   >>   
   >> Economics as in personal economics should be taught to everyone.   
   >>   
   >   
   > Should be, yes.  Any idea why it isn't?  I've several, mostly   
   > relating to the real potential for abuse by anyone writing   
   > the "curriculum" for such a course.  And also, if you standardize   
   > then anyone who finds a bug in the "program" pwns! yous all.   
      
   Simple answer is that it isn't important to government and is actually   
   desirable to a point.  G12 is about raising good government sheep, it   
   isn't about teaching people how to think or be successful.  It is about   
   saying big government is always good and you should worship government.   
      
   Take how society is geared. Taxation is modern day slavery, if you make   
   good money then they tax you insanely.  The idea is to keep you working   
   taxed poor.   
      
   Second is optional, but people subscribe to debt.  Debt is voluntary   
   slavery, a chattel on your ass.  But preys on personal greed of must   
   have it now so charge it.  Far too easy to get enslaving debt.  And   
   government has no interests in teaching people this viewpoint as it has   
   the stupid sheep pay for the banking system.   
      
   People think that benevolence exists in our government, it does not.  I   
   is about government controling the herd.  Yep, we are a managed herd of   
   sheep, thus sheeples.   
      
   Most people would call me rich, so I am not a bitter slave slug on the   
   outs whining.  Just observing the facts.  Keep them people working   
   slaves to the system....allows those we do not see the wealth and power   
   over us for their own greeds and lusts for control.   
      
   Now realizing this early in life helped me become rich.  While you can't   
   really duck the government taxation slavery and greed, you can avoid the   
   bank greed.  Simply don't go in debt for much other than your first   
   home, and pay it off fast.  Once out of the slave hold, you then begin   
   to pay yourself to become richer.   
      
   Yet people, every election always vote with their greed, politicians   
   know this.  This is why they pander, promise a lot.  Like Jack Laytoon   
   (NDP), focused hate rallies people.  You can actually get books that   
   descrribe the theories of focused hate, conflict management, passive   
   aggression and the like.  They are used on you every day everywhere.   
      
   Never take government at face value, lying to manage the herd is their   
   game.  And main stream media is a branch of the government.  Control the   
   media, control the herd.   
   --   
   Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)