XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: nospam@thanksalot.com   
      
   "Cøns=40%govt"  wrote in message   
   news:o0yLp.2890$g12.309@newsfe20.iad...   
   >> "Cøns=40%govt"  wrote in message   
   >> news:FEsLp.12246$lW4.606@newsfe07.iad...   
   >>> And still more bull from a member of the Misogynist Boys Club of   
   >>> Victoria.   
   >>>   
   >>> You lost against the 'feminazis' because the judge decided that what   
   >>> they said about you and the Boys, was "fair comment".  Loved it.   
   >   
   >   
   > "merlin!"  wrote in message   
   > news:krxLp.2388$Md1.1670@newsfe19.iad...   
   >> yeah yeah... the nazi-newsletter "comment" defence. Just their opinion...   
   >> blah blah blah. Not factual research, not true... not even qualified   
   >> privilege. pathetic defense, usually reserved for backwoods nazi   
   >> hillbillies in Sooke (and media bigmouths).   
   >>   
   >> That's the best that the high-priced lawyer was able to get for the   
   >> smartest militant feminist government researchers in Canada? Pathetic.   
   >>   
   >> No bloody wonder the government cancelled their research program, cut   
   >> their funding, and fired most of them.   
   >>   
   >> Time to finish the job, now. We don't need to pay for that kind of crap   
   >> in our taxes when we have you to spew it here for free! Please do   
   >> continue to defend them with your vile lies and additional slander   
   >> because that helps make a stronger case for dis-establishing SWC much   
   >> much easier.   
   >   
   > My, my . . . .  vengeful little misogynist, aren't you?   
      
   You see, KKKaren, the judge agreed that I am not a misogynist. The judge   
   found that particular lie to be defamatory. You should show more respect for   
   the decisions of the court, lest the court lose respect for you. I accept   
   the judgment, and so should you.   
      
   > It was a JUDGE that saw through your  "they defamed me!" shit.   
      
   Read the judgment. The judge was quite clear, he said they did defame me.   
   Very clear. They did.  What part of this are you having trouble   
   understanding?   
      
   Allow me to explain, using small words and short sentences:   
      
   Do you really think feminists won? Seriously KKKaren, in the long run, you   
   and your feminazi friends would have been a lot smarter to have settled out   
   of court. By getting a "fair comment" defence for feminist government   
   research, you accepted a judgment that says feminist government research is   
   merely opinion, and isn't factual. Why do you think ALL SWC RESEARCH is GONE   
   from the government website and isn't published anymore?   
      
   But you were (and still are) so so focussed on beating me, that you miss the   
   big picture. Sure, you did win a small battle against me personally   
   (congratulations!), but you lost the war by doing so.   
      
   It's all over now, except the mopping up, and you have nobody to blame   
   except yourselves, your arrogance, your greed, your disregard of ethics, and   
   your stupidity.   
      
   The judge clearly stated that the the government research was Defamatory.   
   The judge denied the government a Truth defence. The judge said feminist   
   government-funded research is merely comment or opinion. The judge said that   
   Academic feminist researchers actually do believe their own lies.   
      
   You need to understand what the judge said: Government research is not   
   factual. Government research is not true. Government research from Status of   
   Women Canada is COMMENT. Government policy research IS DEFAMATORY   
      
   The government researchers got the "big-mouth whiner - freedom of speech"   
   nazi newsletter defense that is reserved for blathering bullshit opinions   
   with no credibility. This judgement means: FEMINIST RESEARCH HAS NO   
   CREDIBILITY.   
      
    You need to understand defamation law in this country, before you go   
   spouting your uninformed nonsense.That judgement got your SWC Agency   
   research completely shredded, removed, ended. Finished. Never to be seen   
   again. You follow that? It cost me a lot of money to do it, but it was worth   
   every penny, and I would do it again.   
      
   > And those judges are still gonna be there if you try it again . . . .   
      
   I shouldn't need to do it again, the CPC now has a majority is very aware of   
   the total waste that is the SWC. You may rely on its days being numbered.   
   Please muster all your feminazi troops to try and save it, we really do want   
   to settle this matter with finality.   
      
   Please don't thank me, I only did my patriotic duty, improving the country   
   by taking out some of the garbage. My childen will have a better life... and   
   all that jazz.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)