XPost: can.general, can.politics   
   From: David@block.net   
      
   On 8/12/2011 9:28 AM, Canuck57 wrote:   
   > On 12/08/2011 8:42 AM, David Johnston wrote:   
   >> On 8/12/2011 12:57 AM, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >>> On 11/08/2011 3:26 PM, David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>> On 8/11/2011 2:58 PM, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >>>>> On 11/08/2011 12:03 PM, David Johnston wrote:   
   >>>>>> On 8/11/2011 12:00 PM, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>>>> Three. Three judges, remember? And you don't need to find one   
   >>>>>>>> "rational   
   >>>>>>>> person" when you are the plaintiff's attorney. You need to pick 12   
   >>>>>>>> people who will either be sympathetic to your client or don't   
   >>>>>>>> really   
   >>>>>>>> care and just want to go home.   
   >>>>>>>   
   >>>>>>> Three judges paid by those that will loose to their employer   
   >>>>>>   
   >>>>>> Unless someone can fire you, they aren't your employer.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> And why top judges and top prosecutors need to be elected, as to   
   >>>>> answer   
   >>>>> not to politicians but the people.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Thank you, no. I've seen the results of that in the United States.   
   >>>   
   >>> Results here are crap.   
   >>   
   >> Based on what?   
   >   
   > Too lengthy to get going here. But you see it all the time, 30 hearings   
   > over 10 years in a mickey mouse deportation for trial to the US? Come,   
   > should only need be one. I could run on with all sorts of CFs from the   
   > bench. Manitoba judges, Quebec judges...   
   >   
      
   Uh-hunh.  Now let me ask you.  Do American judges do better for being   
   elected?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)