39b917c8   
   XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general   
   From: Canuck57@nospam.com   
      
   On 19/10/2011 8:36 AM, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   > On Oct 18, 8:38 pm, Canuck57 wrote:   
   >> On 18/10/2011 4:37 PM, Alan Baggett wrote:   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>   
   >>> 752 Fisherman Finally Get Tax Justice : CRA SOTW   
   >>   
   >>> Payback time   
   >>   
   >>> Published on September 28, 2011 Published on September 28, 2011   
   >>   
   >>> It’s about time. Monday, 752 fishermen found out that the federal   
   >>> government is finally going to treat them fairly after years and years   
   >>> of dragging its feet.   
   >>   
   >>> It’s a case that dates back to 2000, when the Canada Revenue Agency   
   >>> (CRA) told fishermen that they would have to pay capital gains tax on   
   >>> fisheries buyout packages. Scores of fishermen did — but a group of   
   >>> fishermen took the CRA to court, and the revenue agency offered them a   
   >>> settlement.   
   >>   
   >>> The 752 others were not told about the deal, because the successful   
   >>> fishermen had to sign confidentiality agreements about the settlement.   
   >>   
   >>> By the time word finally leaked out, the time limitation on taking   
   >>> action against the CRA had expired, with the CRA laughing all the way   
   >>> to the bank.   
   >>   
   >>> For years, the fishermen who had been kept in the dark argued that the   
   >>> case should be reopened, and that they should have an opportunity to   
   >>> have their taxes reassessed.   
   >>> In May, a Newfoundland Supreme Court judge agreed, and Monday, the   
   >>> federal government finally said it would not be appealing the decision   
   >>> and that the reassessments would begin. The decision not to appeal is   
   >>> just about the first decent thing the federal government has done   
   >>> during this whole sordid saga.   
   >>   
   >>> The case has been dragging on for a decade in a battle where the CRA   
   >>> held all the cards and made all the decisions. Fishermen who should   
   >>> have received reassessments no question asked after the first   
   >>> settlements, instead had to hire lawyers and fight to keep the issue   
   >>> on the public and political agendas.   
   >>   
   >>> Their lawyer, Eli Baker, says almost all of his clients are living   
   >>> below the poverty line, some of them unable to heat their homes   
   >>> properly in winter.   
   >>   
   >>> The CRA certainly has a responsibility to ensure that it isn’t simply   
   >>> handing out reassessments willy-nilly, but this kind of high-handed   
   >>> treatment of citizens with little ability to challenge its actions is   
   >>> nothing short of despicable.   
   >>   
   >>> Now that the battle is over, hopefully the fishermen will get their   
   >>> due — not only the thousands of dollars of taxes that were improperly   
   >>> collected, but also a decade’s-worth of interest on the amount. It’s   
   >>> unlikely to do anything to dispel the deep mistrust these people must   
   >>> have for an agency of their government.   
   >>   
   >>> But there are things the money can’t do. It’s little reward for the 76   
   >>> fishermen who have died since the money was paid out in error.   
   >>   
   >>> And nothing will undo the most despicable aspect of the government’s   
   >>> behaviour: insisting on confidentiality agreements as part of a   
   >>> settlement to essentially deprive other fishermen from knowing they   
   >>> had an opportunity to challenge the decision. At that point, the CRA   
   >>> should have notified everyone affected about its new determination   
   >>> about fishing licence buybacks and capital gains.   
   >>   
   >>> Unequal treatment when you’ve already admitted you’ve made a mistake,   
   >>> and then waiting for time limitations to expire so that you can keep   
   >>> money you’ve already admitted you shouldn’t have taken? It’s not the   
   >>> way a government agency should behave.   
   >>   
   >> Still cleaning up Liberal bullshit?   
   >>   
   >> But really, if I own something like that but not fishery, I would have   
   >> to pay. Sounds like Liberals were pulling favors for buddies and   
   >> kickbacks. The tax system is about government screwing the people.   
   >>   
   >> All the same, better in their pockets. Ottawa would just waste it.   
   >>   
   >> --   
   >> Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But   
   >> we have big huge government we can't afford...   
   >> -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude- Hide quoted text -   
   >>   
   >> - Show quoted text -   
   >   
   > It's a shame that they didn't just treat everybody the same from the   
   > getgo.   
   >   
   > What a waste of taxpayer's dollars going to court to fight a losing   
   > cause.   
      
   And why the system is corrupt. Too many screwed up loop holes. But   
   lawyers love it, so we often elect lawyers...makes no sense. We need a   
   leader that isn't a corrupted academic profession government chair   
   mushroom and nor a lawyer snake.   
      
   Tax system needs lower rates and less holes. Including the one Paul   
   Martian and other use.   
   --   
   Eat the rich, screw the companies and wonder why there are no jobs. But   
   we have big huge government we can't afford...   
    -- Obama and the lefty fleabagger attitude   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|