XPost: can.general, can.politics, ott.general
From: Canuck57@nospam.com
On 20/11/2011 2:34 PM, John Fleming wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011 17:31:52 -0700, while chained to a desk
> in the scriptorium Canuck57 wrote:
>> $On 19/11/2011 9:09 AM, John Fleming wrote:
>> $> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:14:03 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> $> in the scriptorium Canuck57 wrote:
>> $>> $On 15/11/2011 7:07 PM, John Fleming wrote:
>> $>> $> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:53:36 -0700, while chained to a desk
>> $>> $> in the scriptorium Canuck57 wrote:
>> $>> $>> $On 15/11/2011 7:45 AM, Alan Baggett wrote:
>> $>> $>
>> $>> $>> $> After the hours and hours and hours she spent talking to
countless
>> $>> $>> $> people about her situation, she couldn't believe how
quickly the whole
>> $>> $>> $> ordeal came to an end.
>> $>> $>> $
>> $>> $>> $Lets hope she is smart enough to capitalize on the opportunity
-- to
>> $>> $>> $keep her legs closed and raise the kids properly.
>> $>> $>
>> $>> $> Or just gets a good old fashioned tubal ligation. Then she
>> $>> $> can spread her legs for whoever she wants and not have to
>> $>> $> worry about unwanted children. And it's easier than
>> $>> $> insisting the hunk of man flesh using her body to wipe up
>> $>> $> his need use a condom as well.
>> $>> $
>> $>> $Bet she saves condom money for booze.
>> $>
>> $> Maybe she does. Or just as likely, maybe her male lovers
>> $> do.
>> $>
>> $> The sad thing is, because they are too cheap to spend a few
>> $> dollars on safe sex, society is going to end up supporting
>> $> all their offspring.
>> $
>> $True, but a self respecting woman wouldn't sleep with a guy like that.
>> $
>> $But society will not support them indefinitely.
>> $
>> $Presents a real long term sustainability problem too. Welfare ho has 8
>> $kids to get big payments from welfare. Working professional people have
>> $to have 2 jobs to pay the taxes for welfare and government corruption,
>> $too tired working-tax poor only have one kid or even no kids.
>
> If I had my way, after two kids, I would make a tubal
> ligation a requirement for receiving welfare. It would put
> an end to the ones who get pregnant just so they can keep
> collecting.
I think it was Massachusetts about 12 years ago that instituted no more
money for new kids on welfare and free birth control. Illegitimate
welfare births dropped 67%.
>> $The opposite of darwin, de-evolution of the species both in cranium and
>> $in social culture.
>
> If you really think about it, socially, they are the ones
> best adapted to a permissive society that sees one of the
> government's roles as helping the poor and downtrodden.
More people as dependants than as workers, worker are outnumbered. To
add to the problem about 1 in 4 over 18 is dependent on the government
somehow, contractor, retired, worker, welfare, kid in school or whatever.
End result, the people who pay for and make society work, the value
added producer is outnumbered and a slave to the majority. So all an
unscrupulous politician has to do is pander with other peoples money and
gets 25% of the vote.
Also why screw the rich and persecute the companies and expect jobs
actually sells to the lower class union types. Add tehm in and
productive members are outvoted.
The right solution would be, if you are on welfare, in prison, a
government worker you get no vote. Normalize a better representation of
clear value direction.
>> $And why Canadian society will fail at some point. it is pretty much
>> $assured we have passed the apex of development of a Canadian culture and
>> $are now in the decay phase.
>> $
>> $Probably why there are so many liberal socialists discarding the
>> $conservative values of self worth, determination, self discipline, self
>> $development, work ethics, save a little often, spend less than you make,
>> $independence....
>
> Our society has declined in this area, I agree.
Because those without the discipline are the ones breeding, parents know
no better, no mentorship there.
>> $Poor snowflake fleabaggers will never understand the best liberty of
>> $them all is economic liberty.
>
> Agree here too.
>
> Best way to guarantee your employment is your ability to
> find work. If you are good at finding work, even in poor
> economies, you will have an income.
>
> (Interestingly enough, the people I know who argue most that
> this is wrong seem to work in union shops--especially
> government union shops. People I know who agree whole
> heartedly are usually small business people and self
> employed.)
People feel entitled to their job with no regard to their performance,
economic conditions or politics. Unions are designed to stall evolution
and foster entitlement and envy and stagnant the environment,
protectionism of sorts. And if they don't get their way, union
thuggery, intimidation and bullying.
BTW, I have been union several times. Left me with no respect for them.
Many unions are weak place holders, others are militant anti-company
to a point they cut their own throats or in the case of government,
screw the taxpayers. Or like GM/CAW and the NDP, Liberal Block bribe
for a coupe d'etat. GM/CAW/UAW got the bailout, but GM lost my
business. Only way to fight the extortion.
--
All successful people have one thing in common, if even for a moment
they think rationally.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
