XPost: ont.politics, ab.politics, can.politics   
   From: Canuck57@nospam.com   
      
   On 06/05/2012 12:45 PM, ConsR@minority.gov wrote:   
   >>> "Canuck57"   wrote in message news:dhxp   
   .21190$8_6.12242@newsfe09.iad...   
   >>>> Greece is why Sarkozy  is in trouble.  Idiot Illuminati Sarkozy bailed   
   out bank buddies and   
   >>>> corrupt.  Yep, enslaved his people with debt and gave others peoples   
   money to his criminal   
   >>>> buddies.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> And if your country (France) is going to corruption, might be better off   
   with socialist   
   >>>> debt   
   >>>> corruption as if your going down, might as well have your own people   
   benefit from it for   
   >>>> the   
   >>>> time the fraud lasts.   
   >   
   >> On 06/05/2012 12:20 PM, ConsR@minority.gov wrote:   
   >>> Sarkozy is just another failed rightwing leader.  They're falling like   
   dominos all over the   
   >>> globe.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57"  wrote in message news:Hpzpr.9   
   5$Xv3.22@newsfe18.iad...   
   >   >  I couldn't care less if he was right or left, I hate corruption.  But   
   >> admit, he is a conservative corrupt back room boy that needs the boot at   
   all costs.   
   >   
   > Just remember which governments have always racked up the corruption   
   scandals.  It surely ain't   
   > the socialist ones.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57">   
   >> But would not bank on a liberal socialist for save the days, France is   
   already bankrupt and   
   >> doubtful a socialist government will be able to pull back from the brink.    
   But at least the   
   >> criminal is out.   
   >>   
   >> Be interested to see if the new socialist government will be corrupt,   
   pretty good odds in 6   
   >> months they will be if not already.   
   >   
   > see above   
   >   
   >>> The most successful governments are those which are formed through   
   coalitions - with one   
   >>> always   
   >>> watching that the other doesn't stray too far left or right.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57">   
   >> Nope, they turn out to be debt pandering other peoples money for votes.   
   >   
   > We haven't had one of those in Canada, so you might tell us which 'socialist   
   government' has   
   > used "other peoples'  money" to buy votes in Canada.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57">   
   >> Best is eDemocracy where polticians have to sell the spending, debt or   
   taxes to the people   
   >> and they vote to keep it or not.  Direct voting, no corrupt criminal proxy   
   MP/MLA/rep in the   
   >> middle.   
   >   
   > What country uses this principle?  Or are you reading theories and   
   translating them into   
   > political wishes?   
   >   
   >>> We, in Canada, are finding out what happens when you give an   
   ultra-rightwing party a   
   >>> majority   
   >>> government, instead of keeping it in check like we did the last 4+ years.    
   Now we're facing   
   >>> the   
   >>> destruction of everything from our environment protections to our most   
   sacred social   
   >>> programs   
   >>> under the same Harper government that didn't dare do these things when   
   they were in a   
   >>> minority   
   >>> status and answerable to the people through two other parties.   
   >>>   
   >>> We live and learn.  Hopefully.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57">   
   >> Actually, your just letting your blind greed of other peoples money blind   
   you.  Things   
   >> haven't changed much at all.  Even after government cuts we have much   
   larger government now   
   >> than in 2006.   
   >   
   > Ya dumb rabbit . . . .  when did you ever hear Harper say he would be making   
   cuts to HIS   
   > government?  The cuts were all slated for average persons' jobs and their   
   social programs and   
   > any legislation that protected them.   
   >   
   > "Canuck57">   
   >> Well, looks like my paying for the bu11shit of Ottawa is coming near to   
   over.  Tax guy says   
   >> my non-Canada no-US tax plan is solid like rock.   
   >   
   > You're so full of shit.  Good thing you don't vote, eh?   
      
      
   I have voted so far every eligible vote i can.   
      
   But admit, will not likely be voting federally or provincially again.   
   Not worth wasting the gas and I am not likely going to be living here   
   for the next onces.   
      
   Harper making cuts?  Even after cuts it is bigger than 2006 when he took   
   office.  Doesn't mater, Cons, Libs or NDP, they are all full of sh1t.   
      
   --   
   Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and   
   other people pay for it.  When the credit runs out and those that pay   
   for it leave, they can all share having nothing but debt and discontentment.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)