Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.taxes    |    All that "free" healthcare has a price    |    23,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,782 of 23,408    |
|    Alan Baggett to All    |
|    Income splitting targeted by federal gov    |
|    17 Sep 13 03:43:21    |
      From: AlanBaggett@volcanomail.com              Income splitting targeted by federal government : CRA SOTW              By Ray Turchansky, Edmonton Journal September 5, 2013                     EDMONTON - Spousal and family trust loans, two seldom used methods of income       splitting that reduce taxes, are about to become less of a bargain.              The Canada Revenue Agency is raising the prescribed interest rate of these       loans from a historic low of 1.0 per cent to 2.0 per cent on Oct. 1.              Income splitting is an effective way to reduce overall taxes involving       spouses, eligible common-law partners, same-sex partners and children, by       moving income from a taxpayer in a higher marginal tax bracket to one in a       lower marginal bracket. There can        be other advantages, especially for seniors, increasing their pension income       tax credits, while also reducing clawbacks of Old Age Security benefits and       the age amount tax credit for people 65 and older.              And there are some occasions when moving money to the higher-income person       allows the lower-income person to claim more medical expense tax credits. Or,       when a high-income earner already has all benefits clawed back, receiving       money from a lower-income        spouse allows the latter to reduce clawbacks.              In the 1990s, a popular strategy had parents giving investments to their       children so the returns would be taxed at the child’s lower tax bracket. But       CRA came up with attribution rules, including one involving children aged 14       and younger, requiring some        of the youngster’s investment income be attributed to the parent, who pays a       so-called “kiddie tax.”              Many legal methods of splitting income remain. Couples can split Canada       Pension Plan benefits if they are eligible and apply, in which case split       amounts are received by cheque. Pension income splitting that started in 2007       is done through the tax return,        and allows the splitting of company pension, life annuities, payments from a       registered retirement income fund, and annuity payments from a registered       retirement savings plan. You can also use spousal RRSPs to split income,       although under attribution        rules, money withdrawn from a spousal RRSP within three years of the last       contribution is taxed in the hands of the contributor.              A business owner can pay “reasonable” salaries to a spouse or children for       work actually done, or give them shares in their company paying dividends,       which are taxed less due to the dividend tax credit. Or, the higher-income       spouse can simply pay all        household expenses and let the lower-income spouse do the investing, so the       capital gains, dividends and interest will be taxed in a lower bracket. And       one spouse can give $5,500 a year to the other, or to a child aged 19 or       older, to invest in a Tax-       Free Savings Account.              Another way to reduce taxation on investment income is through the previously       mentioned spousal loan or for children through a family trust, to invest in       stocks, bonds or mutual funds. CRA requires spousal and family trust loans be       in writing, outlining        terms of repayment and an interest rate at least as much as the prescribed CRA       rate at the time of the agreement, the rate being good for the length of the       loan. The current rate has been 1.0 per cent since April 2009, but the       increase to 2.0 per cent        this October could begin a return to the 5.0 per cent rate seen at the end of       2007.              The loan should be made by cheque so there is a paper trail. The loan       principal doesn’t have to be paid back, but annual interest must be paid by       one spouse to the other by Jan. 30 of the following year, and should also be       made by cheque. If interest isn’       t paid, under attribution rules, investment returns are taxed in the hands of       the spouse giving the loan.              The higher-income spouse making the loan receives and pays tax on the interest       received. The lower-income spouse gets a tax deduction for interest paid on a       loan producing investment income from stocks, bonds or mutual funds, and pays       taxes on returns at        a lower rate.              Adrian Mastracci, portfolio manager with KCM Wealth Management Inc. in       Vancouver, gives the example of a higher-income spouse lending $100,000 to a       lower-income spouse at 1.0 per cent. The higher-income spouse is taxed on       $1,000 interest received. The        lower income spouse invests the money and makes a $4,000 return, then is taxed       on the $4,000 return minus $1,000 interest paid. That means net income of       $3,000 is moved from the higher-taxed person to the lower-taxed person each       year during the length of        the loan.              The annual saving could be $720 a year in Alberta. And savings increase as       loan interest rates are lower and investment returns are higher.              mailto:turchan@telusplanet.netmailto:turchan@telusplanet.netturc       an@telusplanet.net       © Copyright (c) The Edmonton Journal                     -----------------------------------------------------------        Miss a Tax Tale Miss a lot!        Visit the CRA SOTW Library at http://canada.revenue.agency.angelfire.com        ------------------------------------------------------------        Alan Baggett – Tax Collector’s Bible - http://taxcollectorsbible.com/               --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca