Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.taxes    |    All that "free" healthcare has a price    |    23,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,844 of 23,408    |
|    =?UTF-8?B?Q29uyYDGpkNvbsmA?= to Greg Carr    |
|    Canada's economy is more than GDP . . .     |
|    02 Mar 14 15:42:26    |
      XPost: can.politics, can.general, soc.culture.canada       XPost: can.atlantic.general, soc.culture.quebec       From: ConsRCons@govt.cda              On 2/28/2014 7:31 AM, none aka Greg Carr wrote:       > Canada's economy expands at 2.9% pace, beating forecasts.       >       > Fourth quarter of 2013 ended on a down note, but economic growth strong       > overall.       >       > Feb 28, 2014                                    Measuring progress with GDP is a gross mistake              Governments, media and much of the public are preoccupied with the       economy. That means demands such as those for recognition of First       Nations treaty rights and environmental protection are often seen as       impediments to the goal of maintaining economic growth. The gross       domestic product has become a sacred indicator of well-being. Ask       corporate CEOs and politicians how they did last year and they’ll refer       to the rise or fall of the GDP.              It’s a strange way to measure either economic or social well-being. The       GDP was developed as a way to estimate economic activity by measuring       the value of all transactions for goods and services. But even Simon       Kuznets, an American economist and pioneer of national income       measurement, warned in 1934 that such measurements say little about “the       welfare of a nation.” He understood there’s more to life than the       benefits that come from spending money.              My wife’s parents have shared our home for 35 years. If we had put them       in a care home, the GDP would have grown. In caring for them ourselves       we didn’t contribute as much. When my wife left her teaching job at       Harvard University to be a full-time volunteer for the David Suzuki       Foundation, her GDP contribution fell. Each time we repair and reuse       something considered disposable we fail to contribute to the GDP.              To illustrate the GDP’s limitations as an indicator of well-being,       suppose a fire breaks out at the Darlington nuclear facility near       Toronto and issues a cloud of radioactivity that blows over the city,       causing hundreds of cases of radiation sickness. All the ambulances,       doctors, medicines and hospital beds will jack up the GDP. And if       people die, funeral services, hearses, flowers, gravediggers and lawyers       will stimulate GDP growth. In the end, cleaning up the Darlington mess       would cost billions and produce a spike in the GDP.              Extreme weather-related events, such as flooding and storms, can also       contribute to increases in GDP, as resources are brought in to deal with       the mess. Damage done by Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy and the BP oil       spill in the Gulf of Mexico added tens of billions to the GDP. If GDP       growth is our highest aspiration, we should be praying for more weather       catastrophes and oil spills.              The GDP replaced gross national product, which was similar but included       international expenditures. In a 1968 speech at the University of       Kansas, Robert Kennedy said, “Too much and for too long, we seemed to       have surrendered personal excellence and community values in the mere       accumulation of material things …Gross national product counts air       pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our       highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the       jails for the people who break them. It counts the destruction of the       redwood and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. It counts       napalm and counts nuclear warheads and armored cars for the police to       fight the riots in our cities ... and the television programs which       glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children.              “Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our       children, the quality of their education or the joy of their play. It       does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our       marriages, the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our       public officials. It measures neither our wit nor our courage, neither       our wisdom nor our learning, neither our compassion nor our devotion to       our country. It measures everything in short, except that which makes       life worthwhile.”              We deserve better indicators of societal well-being that extend beyond       mere economic growth. Many economists and social scientists are       proposing such indicators. Some argue we need a “genuine progress       indicator”, which would include environmental and social factors as well       as economic wealth. A number of groups, including Friends of the Earth,       have suggested an Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare, which would       take into account “income inequality, environmental damage, and       depletion of environmental assets.” The Kingdom of Bhutan has suggested       measuring gross national happiness.              Whatever we come up with, it has to be better than GDP with its absurd       emphasis on endless growth on a finite planet.              By David Suzuki              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca