Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    can.taxes    |    All that "free" healthcare has a price    |    23,408 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 22,865 of 23,408    |
|    Canuck57 to Alan Baggett    |
|    Re: Shelter Inc. ? :CRA SOTW    |
|    17 Apr 14 14:27:47    |
      From: Canuck57@nospam.com              On 15/04/2014 5:39 AM, Alan Baggett wrote:       > Shelter Inc. ? :CRA SOTW       >       > Shelter Inc.?       >       > Jaime Golombek       > National Post,       >       > If you operate your small business through a corporation, no doubt you are       fully aware of the two main potential tax advantages: a preferential corporate       tax rate on the first $500,000 of "active business income" as well as access       to the $750,000        lifetime capital-gains exemption, which may be used to shelter from tax some       or all of the capital gain on the ultimate sale of your business.       >       > These are significant advantages, so much so that some investors are tempted       to transfer their investments into a corporation to take advantage of them.       But be aware, the tax rules only grant these advantages to corporations that       earn active business        income (ABI).       > In general, the definition of ABI excludes investment income as well as       rental income. But that's not always the case. Corporations that do earn such       income, but that are sufficiently active that they employ more than five       full-time employees, can        still qualify for these tax advantages.       >       > While this phrase "more than five full-time employees" seems ostensibly       straightforward, it was the subject of a recent Tax Court decision that       directly reverses a long-standing Canada Revenue Agency administrative policy.       The case involved a private        company that had five full-time employees and two part-time employees. The       issue was whether the company employed "more than five full-time employees."       The CRA has always maintained, as articulated in its Interpretation Bulletin,       "The Small Business        Deduction," that "more than five full-time" means the company must employ at       least six full-time individuals. The Court disagreed and concluded that having       some part-time employees can put you over the "more than five full-time" test.              Just more CRA tax greed. As when I read it, I said then five FTE plus a       part timer aught to do it.                     --       Socialist-statism corruption is a great idea so long as the credit is       good and other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those       that pay for it leave, they can all share having nothing but       unemployment, debt and discontentment.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca