home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   ca.politics      California politics      187,313 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 185,737 of 187,313   
   super70s to Trump's Bitch   
   Re: Debate questions for tRump   
   09 Sep 24 07:58:54   
   
   XPost: or.politics, alt.politics.trump, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh   
   From: super70s@super70s.invalid   
      
   In article ,   
    Trump's Bitch  wrote:   
      
   > On Sun, 8 Sep 2024 20:04:33 -0000 (UTC), Baxter   
   >  wrote:   
   >   
   > >'Federal investigators received classified intelligence that suggested   
   > >the president of Egypt gave you a $10 million 'cash bribe,' but your   
   > >attorney general blocked the probe, according to the Washington Post.   
   > >Democrats on the House Oversight Committee last week asked you to provide   
   > >the funding source of a $10 million donation you gave your campaign   
   > >around the same time and how it was repaid. Will you make that   
   > >documentation public?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   funding source is talked about as being corrupt, it is relatively   
   speaking not very corrupt compared to the kind of numbers we'll be   
   taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country that can   
   afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >You have flip-flopped your position on abortion over the years, including   
   > >saying you were 'very pro-choice' and later claiming women who get   
   > >abortions should be punished. Last month, you gave two different answers   
   > >within 24 hours regarding Florida‚s six-week abortion ban. Can you   
   > >clarify your position and whether you support a national abortion ban?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   position on abortion is talked about as being unpopular, it is   
   relatively speaking not very unpopular compared to the kind of numbers   
   we'll be taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country   
   that can afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >You called for prosecuting President Joe Biden, executing your former   
   > >chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mark Milley, and jailing former   
   > >Rep. Liz Cheney. If elected, will you follow through on any of these   
   > >threats or go after other political enemies?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   getting revenge on my political enemies about as being unpopular, it is   
   relatively speaking not very unpopular compared to the kind of numbers   
   we'll be taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country   
   that can afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >You use faulty claims to criticize Biden and Harris for not doing more   
   > >about the border. But you worked to kill a bipartisan bill Biden and   
   > >Harris supported that included the toughest immigration reforms ever. So,   
   > >is your stance on immigration aimed at scoring political points or   
   > >finding real solutions?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   position on the border is talked about as being unworkable, it is   
   relatively speaking not very unworkable compared to the kind of numbers   
   we'll be taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country   
   that can afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >You have criticized Biden's efforts to negotiate a cease-fire regarding   
   > >Israel's war in Gaza. But the Wall Street Journal said you don't have a   
   > >plan. What would you do differently than Biden? And did you urge Prime   
   > >Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to delay a cease-fire deal until after the   
   > >election?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   position on Gaza is talked about as being non-existent, it is relatively   
   speaking not very non-existent compared to the kind of numbers we'll be   
   taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country that can   
   afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >You claim to 'know nothing' about Project 2025, yet you support   
   > >initiatives in the plan to fire thousands of federal civil service   
   > >workers, curtail the U.S. Justice Department's independence, and abolish   
   > >the U.S. Education Department. So, how does your position differ from   
   > >these same plans spelled out in Project 2025?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   Project 2025 plan is talked about as being unpopular, it is relatively   
   speaking not very unpopular compared to the kind of numbers we'll be   
   taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country that can   
   afford to take care of its people."   
      
   > >If Harris is as radical as you claim, why would more than 200 Republicans   
   > >who previously worked for former President George W. Bush, the late Sen.   
   > >John McCain, or Sen. Mitt Romney endorse her?   
      
   "We are going to be taking in trillions of dollars. And as much as my   
   former political allies are talked about as being unfaithful, they are   
   relatively speaking not very unfaithful compared to the kind of numbers   
   we'll be taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country   
   that can afford to take care of its people."   
      
   >  It doesn't matter what you ask him. He will ignore it and ramble on about   
   > nonsense.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca