XPost: alt.home.repair, rec.autos.tech   
   From: ollie@invalid.net   
      
   On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 11:31:29 -0600, Oliver wrote   
      
   > However, my argument about the liberals being 'science deniers' is that   
   > they mandated a technology claiming it doesn't pollute - and yet - it does.   
      
   I should make the very clear point that I'm not against the "choice" of   
   electric lawn mowers alongside gas lawn mowers.   
      
   I'm not even against a law that makes sense, which mandates the use of one   
   or the other, under penalty of force (which is, after all, what a law is).   
      
   What I'm against is the liberals of California don't actually care about   
   the environment when they mandate the use of electric lawn mowers which   
   clearly pollute about twice as much as gasoline mowers pollute.   
      
   The California liberals not only take away your rights....   
   But the California liberals mandate you pollute twice as much!   
      
   The easiest way to summarize my problem with the California liberals isn't   
   so much that they're science deniers, nor that the liberals are always   
   trying to take away your rights, but that liberals are duplicitous liars.   
      
   Keep in mind I've said nothing about the conservatives in that argument.   
      
   My problem is the liberals have taken away my right to choose my lawn mower   
   technology, and as a result, they mandated I pollute twice as much.   
      
   I welcome anyone who knows science to argue that lithium doesn't pollute.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|