XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, seattle.politics
XPost: fl.politics, rec.aviation.military
From: jfwaldby@gmail.com
Baxter wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= wrote in
> news:m57p47Fcjh2U1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> Baxter wrote:
>>> =?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= wrote in
>>> news:m575liF9k3iU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>
>>>> Baxter wrote:
>>>>> =?UTF-8?Q?.../v]andrak|=e2=89=a1...?= wrote in
>>>>> news:m55s5oF3d1vU1@mid.individual.net:
>>>>>
>>>>>> pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-02, Jim Wilkins wrote:
>>>>>>>> "a425couple" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:cb_GP.1505435$OrR5.1147630@fx18.iad...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 3/31/25 16:43, John Smyth wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 'How Dems secretly paid social media influencers to push Kamala
>>>>>>>>> Harris during 2024 vote'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ----------------------------
>>>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda_techniques
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The emphasis on emotional instead of intelligent content shows
> what
>>>>>>>> the Dem leaders really think of their followers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> True.
>>>>>>> Senator Chris Coons blurted out that Americans are idiots and
>>>>>>> couldn't even locate Greenland on a map.
>>>>>>> The democrats have been playing the people for suckers for
> decades.
>>>>>>> Fortunately the people have finally realized this which is why
> their
>>>>>>> party is circling the drain.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the democrats would use the money for Democratic interests that
>>>>>> they fundraised it might be different. They've got a million
> scoops
>>>>>> laid out, webs to capture money but it is lining pockets. Lies are
>>>>>> told and a Democrat can't help his party.
>>>>>
>>>>> Name names, give details.
>>>>
>>>> They invoke names like Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi etc. on phone
>>>> messages from various phone numbers.
>>>>
>>>> Once they talked about Trump having just held a rally and Democratic
>>>> leaders were in uproar about what he said. I then looked all through
>>>> the news and there was nothing about a Trump rally or the 'horrid'
>>>> things he called Democrats.
>>>>
>>>> Other times they say how they just need a few more donations to seal
>>> the
>>>> win and then next day you view the loss.
>>>>
>>>> In the case of the April 1st elections, they claimed that some
>>> donations
>>>> would get us the seats and I come to the polls and there's a huge
>>> margin
>>>> Democrat loss.
>>>>
>>>> There is no transparency after the donation. This is why I can't
> show
>>>> you some satellite photos of Democrats misusing the money or records
> to
>>>> the effect.
>>>>
>>>> I named names and gave some details. Therefore, Baxter, I do not
>>> expect
>>>> your next response to be filled with rebuke, such as Shark335 invokes
>>>> any time he is questioned.
>>>
>>> Who is "they"? You haven't actually cited ANY details.
>>>
>> Rebuke.
>>
>> You didn't say "cite" You said "name". Pussy.
>>
>
> You just grabbed some random names and attached to a generalized rant
> about something that every fund-raiser does. You failed to establish
> that any of the people you named were "lining their pockets" with
> donations - legally or illegally.
>
I said there was no transparency. What part of "no transparency" do you
not understand. You said I failed to establish something I gave a good
piece of evidence for. I said there was no transparency, deaf man.
--
Cursed to be walking in the shadows of death
--- SoupGate-DOS v1.05
* Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)
|
